My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/26/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 03/26/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:26:31 PM
Creation date
3/22/2019 9:22:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/26/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The applicant is proposing to extend Rivlyn Avenue which would terminate at a public cul-de-sac. The total <br />cul-de-sac length would be approximately 950 feet, based on aerial photos. Staff would need this exact <br />measurement with the submittal of the preliminary plat, and the Planning Commission would need to grant a <br />variance to total cul-de-sac length in order for the project to move forward. The road would be a public road, and <br />sidewalks will be required on at least one side of the road (which is not currently shown on the plan set). Staff will <br />seek a Parks and Recreation recommendation on sidewalks. The applicant is not proposing access onto Highway <br />10, though the City Police Department has requested an emergency access from the north, potentially a trail with <br />breakaway barriers. <br />Landscaping <br />The site will require density transitioning to the adjacent properties to the west, which are located in the R-1 <br />Residential District. The site layout is challenging, so additional discussions are required. A tree preservation and a <br />landscaping plan will be required with Preliminary Plat submittal. The density transitioning requirements will likely <br />cause some of the lots to shift in order to meet the requirements. Staff has also requested landscaping along the <br />northern edge of the property for the homes abutting the commercial properties to the north. Staff will need <br />additional discussions with the Developer on this topic. <br />Planning Commission <br />The Planning Commission met on March 7, 2019 and discussed the sketch plan. Staff did receive verbal comments <br />and input from residents at the meeting who felt it was appropriate to require density transitioning and felt more <br />comfortable with 12 lots than 14. Residents also expressed concern over the private dock due to low water levels in <br />that area, as well as increased foot traffic. <br />The Planning Commission recommended the City Council view the sketch plan and supported Staffs <br />recommendation of moving forward to preliminary plat with increased landscaping, density transitioning, and a <br />reduction of 2 lots. Based on the Planning Commission's feedback, the Applicant updated their proposed sketch <br />plan to include density transitioning. Please see the attached plan set (original), updated plan set (includes density <br />transitioning) and an overlay of the two plan sets. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with processing the Application are the responsibility of the Applicant. There are no requests <br />for financial assistance from the City at this time. However, given the amount of construction debris cleanup, the <br />project is seeking cleanup funds from the State of Minnesota. This may require some sort of local match. These <br />discussions will occur at future stages of the project. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff seeks broad policy direction on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendment requirement. This is a <br />discretionary action. Staff does not object to the project if the City desires to move forward, contingent upon <br />compliance with Staff Review. <br />Action: <br />Staff seeks broad policy direction on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendment requirement. This is a <br />discretionary action. Staff does not object to the project if the City desires to move forward, contingent upon <br />compliance with Staff Review. <br />Attachments <br />Updated Plan Set <br />Comparison to Planning Commission Version <br />Planning Report <br />Staff Review (ProjectDox) <br />Landscape Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.