My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/26/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 03/26/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:26:31 PM
Creation date
3/22/2019 9:22:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/26/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 03/26/2019 <br />Submitted For: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />7. 3. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Review Sketch Plan for Rivenwick Subdivision (Project No. 19-02); Case of Paxmar <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to review a Sketch Plan for a subdivision within the Rivenwick neighborhood. The <br />Planning Commission considered this sketch plan at its regularly scheduled meeting on March 7th. While City <br />Code only requires that the Sketch Plan go before the Planning Commission, given the complexity of this case, Staff <br />recommended that the project be reviewed by the City Council prior to proceeding with Preliminary Plat. <br />The Planning Commission was generally supportive of the project as presented and indicated support for either <br />attached or detached townhomes if the commercial pad was required to meet the minimum 2.0 acre lot requirement. <br />The Developer is Paxmar. The proposed project is located within the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development <br />District. It is guided the same in the Comprehensive Plan. The Development is proposed to be made up of three (3) <br />main components. The MU/PUD is the guiding, or umbrella district. Within that guidance, Staff is applying the <br />appropriate traditional districts for review based on the land use and density types. A map is included to visualize <br />this breakdown. <br />1. Two (2) Acre Commercial Parcel (using the B-2 Business District for review) <br />2. Two (2) Acre Assisted Living Parcel (using the R-3 Residential District [high density residential] for review) <br />3. Detached Townhome Neighborhood (using the R-2 Residential District [medium density residential] for <br />review) <br />This is a unique district that is only applied in a couple areas of the community. The Rivenwick Neighborhood is the <br />only existing neighborhood/development where the District actually applies. The main intent of this district was to <br />provide flexibility in final layout versus strict district boundaries. This should not be interpreted to require urban <br />mixed -use buildings. The current version of the MU/PUD District states that any one use may not comprise of more <br />than 75% of the project area. According to Staff Review for the original subdivision, this remaining parcel was to <br />develop as a retail/commercial use. However, the maximum coverage per land use type at the time was 70%, which <br />as since been amended to 75%. <br />Notification: <br />Staff has attempted to notify all Property Owners within 700 feet of the Subject Property via Standard US Mail of <br />the Sketch Plan Review. Public Hearings will be required with the Preliminary Plat stage. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Based on a review of acreage, it is estimated that the final layout would result in approximately 80% residential and <br />20% commercial retail. The amount of residential exceeds the maximum threshold of 75% under existing zoning <br />standards, unless the City considers the assisted living facility commercial and not residential. <br />Staff is seeking broad policy direction as to whether the City approves of the concept master plan. With said broad <br />policy direction, Staff will work on the appropriate tool to obtain approval of said master plan. It is not the intent of <br />this case at this time to do a detail review as to compliance with any particular district standard. Staff simply desires <br />to know if the City wants to get to the finish line at this time, and will use subsequent meetings to navigate the <br />particulars. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.