My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/26/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 03/26/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:26:31 PM
Creation date
3/22/2019 9:22:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/26/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Riley referenced the price range on the Highway 10 monument sign and asked <br />for details. <br />City Planner McGuire Brigl stated that she reached out to different sign companies and received <br />three quotes from three companies. She stated that two companies were very comparable, while <br />one company came in much lower than the others did. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that when you receive a low bidder and the <br />other bidders are comparable, that has to be considered. He noted that if you choose the lowest <br />bidder perhaps there are additional change orders or costs that come in the future because there <br />are not construction drawings. <br />Councilmember Shryock referenced the Ramsey Boulevard sign and noted that she would be in <br />favor of updating that sign. <br />Mayor LeTourneau stated that it seems that Ramsey is getting to a point of maturity where <br />wayfinding signs on the highway will direct customers to businesses within Ramsey. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that if the tenant panels are removed from the <br />City sign, there would be pushback from the business community. He stated that there are <br />requests from additional businesses that would like to be included on the sign. He noted that <br />perhaps the City charges for placement on the sign. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she favors the City of Ramsey over The COR. She stated <br />that when people see The COR sign on Ramsey Boulevard, it does not provide direction on <br />where to go. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that directionally this is becoming more complicated than it <br />needs to be. She stated that she is not opposed to changing the sign to the City of Ramsey; she <br />was just asking if the subheadings were still going to be used or eliminated. She believed that <br />the City is a ways off from the highway wayfinding signs and believed that the Ramsey <br />Boulevard sign will help bring people into the businesses. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the sign could focus on City of Ramsey and then a subpanel <br />could state COR business district, or retail district, as that would help to bring in customers. <br />Councilmember Riley asked if tenant panels will become outdated when more retailers come in. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the City continues to receive requests for <br />large tenant panel signs from the private market. He stated that if there was a true shopping <br />center, the shopping center would build a sign with tenant panels. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that she would prefer for the City to have the signs and charge <br />for tenant panels to create consistency with locations in key sectors. <br />City Council Work Session / March 12, 2019 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.