Laserfiche WebLink
The primary benefit of incorporating infiltration BMPs into the site is achieved during <br />small storm events. Table 17.5 compares site discharge for the 1-year and 10-year, 24- <br />hour rainfall events considering site design that first excludes infiltration in the basins <br />and then considers infiltration in the basins. <br />For existing conditions, a peak flow of 2.3 cfs discharge at the Highway 10 culvert for the <br />1-year, 24-hour event is due to local drainage south of the railroad tracks only, as there is <br />no flow leaving the site at the railroad tracks. As discussed earlier, the flow discharging <br />from Highway 10 is small and does not reach the Mississippi River. For proposed <br />development conditions excluding infiltration in the basins, peak discharge into the <br />Mississippi River would be 14.4 cfs. By incorporating infiltration basins into the site, <br />peak flow is reduced by 50 percent (7.8 cfs) and volume discharge is also significantly <br />reduced.. The 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event results in a slight reduction in peak flow, <br />but significant reduction in volume (50 percent) by incorporating the infiltration BMPs. <br />Table 17.5. Comparison of peak flows and volumes discharged from site for 1-year and <br />10-year events <br />1-year 24-hour rainfall 10-year 24-hour rainfall <br />Model (2.3 inches precipitation) (4.1 inches precipitation) <br />Peak flow (cfs) Volume (ac-ft) Peak flow (cfs) Volume (ac-ft) <br />Existing conditions 2.3 0.3 7.1 0.7 <br />Proposed 14.4 14.4 23.1 65.0 <br />Proposed 7.8 4.0 22.6 35.4 <br />w/ infiltration occurring <br />Proposed — mitigation <br />plan with revisions 19.1 25.3 24.5 84.2 <br />requested by County <br />Smaller, more frequent rainfall events are critical for water quality. Achievement of <br />long-term year-round water quality benefits requires the ability to retain and treat smaller <br />storm events. To meet LRRWMO water quality requirements based on NURP design <br />criteria, the final design should provide for a dead storage volume of at least 38 ac-ft, <br />which is the volume required to accommodate the runoff volume from a 2.5-inch rainfall <br />event (excluding infiltration in basins). <br />Water Quality Modeling <br />Water Quality Under Developed Conditions. As shown in a previous section, the amount <br />of water leaving the site under current conditions is minimal. Consequently, the amount <br />of pollution associated with the runoff is equally minimal. However, this all changes <br />once development occurs. An increase in nonpoint pollution from this site will occur <br />from many new sources, including some or all of the following: <br />17-11 <br />