My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/26/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 02/26/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:23:20 PM
Creation date
3/22/2019 10:45:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/26/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
656
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7.87 MGD of flow would be generated. The MCES interceptors and the City's <br />collection system have been designed for this ultimate flow at full build -out. <br />However, because of bottlenecks in the MCES system downstream of Ramsey, <br />maximum average daily flows are currently limited to an allocation of <br />approximately 3.8 MGD. Therefore, it appears the existing collection system is <br />sized to handle the flows projected in this report." <br />Comment 4.2: Section 18b. Paragraph 3 - I am not sure if 2.8 MGD is 30% of the <br />capacity at the Anoka lift station. The Comprehensive Sewer Plan states that 2.8 MGD is <br />approximately 35% of the ultimate flow at full build out. <br />Response: See response to Comment 4.1 above. <br />Comment 4.3: Section 18b. Paragraph 4 - The revised document makes <br />recommendations that the City contact the MCES to make a new agreement for allocated <br />capacity. Is this the City's document? If it is I think the language should be modified so <br />that the City is not making recommendations to the City. <br />Response: True, this is the City's document, but clearly it consists of a series of <br />recommendations to the City by the document preparer. The final mitigation plan will be <br />changed to more directly reflect actions that will be taken by the City. <br />Comment 4.4: Section 18b. Paragraph 6 - The Mississippi River interceptor has a <br />capacity of 10 MGD not 8 and the capacity of 2.8 to 3.8 MGD is controlled by down <br />stream facilities that will need to be upgraded when the City's flow increases. <br />Response: The paragraph has been modified as follows: <br />"The two regional interceptors serving the City have a combined peak capacity of <br />18.0 MGD. The Rum River MUSA District, which is served by a 30-inch <br />diameter interceptor, has a maximum design capacity of about 8 million gallons <br />per day (MGD). The Mississippi River MUSA District, which is served by a 30- <br />inch diameter interceptor, has a maximum peak design capacity of about 10 <br />MGD. As stated earlier, although the collection system and interceptors are <br />designed to carry 7.87 MGD, it is assumed that only 2.8 to 3.8 MGD of average <br />daily flow capacity is currently available in the regional system due to <br />downstream bottlenecks." <br />Comment 4.5: Section 18b. Paragraph 7 - ADD - "before upgrades will be needed in the <br />downstream facilities." to the last sentence. <br />Response: Changed in text as suggested. <br />Comment 4.6: Table 18.7 - The average daily flow for the Mississippi River District <br />matches the flow I had figured pretty close but the peaking factor of 2.13 that they use to <br />calculate the peak flow is less than those used in the Comprehensive Sewer Plan, which <br />were approximately 2.3 to 2.5. <br />34-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.