Laserfiche WebLink
Randy Hedland, Landform Professional Services, thanked the Commission for their <br />consideration. He explained the units would range in price from $320,000 to $450,000. He <br />commented on the tree preservation plan for the property and noted the builder was more than <br />willing to provide additional screening along the property line. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked what the square footage was for the proposed lots. <br />City Planner McGuire Brigl reported all but two lots meet the City's square footage <br />requirements. <br />Commissioner VanScoy questioned if this development would have a homeowner's association. <br />Mr. Hedland reported this was the case. <br />Rich Annis, 5690 152nd Lane NW, stated he did not support the proposed development. He <br />believed the proposed lot sizes would not fit in with the surrounding neighborhood. <br />Judy Annis, 5690 152nd Lane NW, asked if the cul-de-sac would be pushed back. <br />Mr. Hedland reported the cul-de-sac would be installed as originally approved on the master <br />plan. <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to close the public <br />hearing. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners VanScoy, Anderson, Gengler, <br />Surma, and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Onyambu. <br />Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 10:01 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner Woestehoff questioned if the lot width reduction was strictly a financial decision. <br />Mr. Hedland explained the proposed lot widths were a new trend and provided for smaller/deeper <br />homes for residents that do not require a 70-foot-wide home. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated he was concerned with how this Ordinance would be utilized. He <br />indicated he had questions with how the extra density would benefit the proposed development. <br />He commented on the physical size of the lots and was pleased that only two were undersized. <br />He explained he was concerned with putting 65-foot-wide lots next to a development that had <br />80-foot-wide lots. <br />City Planner McGuire Brigl clarified the lots to the north were 70-foot-wide lots. She <br />commented further on the density of the proposed development. <br />Planning Commission/February 7, 2019 <br />Page 14of18 <br />