Laserfiche WebLink
5. COMMITTEE BUSINESS <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />6. COMMITTEE / STAFF INPUT <br /> <br />6.01: Public Information Meeting on Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1 Amendment <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby stated that the purpose of this case is to conduct a public information <br />meeting on the Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1 Amendment. He stated that City staff has been <br />working w <br />January 4, 2020 but must be amended by October 6, 2019. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby provided details on the elements included in Part 1 and Part 2 of the <br />WHPP. He stated that the MDH determined that a full update of Part 1 was not necessary and <br />identified delineations and vulnerabilities in 2018. He stated that the MDH approved the Part 1 <br />amendment on January 29, 2019. He noted that the amendment material was distributed to local <br />meeting. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby provided information on the eight City wells and displayed a table with <br />the specific information for each well. <br /> <br />Chairperson Riley asked why two of the wells are listed as not vulnerable and what that means. <br /> <br />Mr. Biernat explained that vulnerability is based on the construction of the well and the known <br />information on the construction of the well. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby continued to provide information on each of the wells including pumping <br />rates and volume of water discharged. He identified the drinking water supply management area <br />(DWSMA), which encumbers the six Ramsey COR wells, and highlighted the changes in the <br />supply areas. He displayed similar information for wells one and two and the DWSMA around <br />those wells. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby stated that the only cost for this Part 1 amendment was some staff time. <br />He noted that Part 2 would have a higher cost and would be more labor intensive. He did not <br />think that staff would have sufficient time to complete the necessary work prior to the October 6, <br />2019 deadline and therefore staff would recommend enlisting a consultant to complete that work. <br />He estimated the cost for the consultant to be between $15,000 and $30,000. He noted that the <br />first step would be for staff to meet with MDH staff to better define the scope. He noted that <br />once that scope is known, the decision could be made on whether an extension could be <br />requested to allow staff to complete the work or whether it would be better to hire a consultant. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked if Barr Engineering would be a willing consultant. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee / March 19, 2019 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />