My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 06/12/2003 - Joint Park & Recreation Commission
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2003
>
Minutes - Council - 06/12/2003 - Joint Park & Recreation Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 4:07:04 PM
Creation date
4/25/2019 1:22:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Joint Park & Recreation Commission
Document Date
06/12/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council meetings a few times a year, rather than just once. He stated that he likes the idea <br />of phasing the parking areas and recommended that the Commission decide what their immediate <br />needs are in moving forward. He stated that the biggest problem he saw was staffing for the <br />maintenance and upkeep of the park because of recent statewide budget issues. He stated that he <br />did not want the needs of people and children to suffer because of budget cuts and felt a lot of <br />planning has gone into this park. He stated that he lives near the park and many of his neighbors <br />have stressed that they like the open spaces and wildlife and hope there is not a significant <br />change to the land. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns stated that she would like to have as much road~vay and parking completed as <br />possible and would also like to have trees planted at the same time. She stated she felt some of <br />the costs for tree planting could be alleviated by using R.Y.A.A. youths as volunteers. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated that having trees was also an important issue to the citizen <br />task force during the park's planning stages. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson explained the timeline and possible routes for the sewer and water <br />connections and how this could effect construction. He stated that the feasibility study should be <br />completed in the next two months. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman reiterated Mayor Gamec's comments that the staffing costs for <br />maintenance and upkeep may have more of an impact than the construction costs. He stated that <br />the City just may not have the staff to support a new park. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ostrum questioned what could be completed with the $215,000 that was approved <br />in the CIP. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated that he felt a class 5 driveway could be completed with no <br />curbing and no trees. <br /> <br />Commissioner LaMere questioned whether the fields would be usable with the class 5 driveway. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated that they would be usable, but that it raised other issues <br />such as people spinning around on the gravel and driving vehicles onto the fields. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ostrum stated that he felt the City needed to be practical and complete what we <br />could with $215,000. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Ostrum, seconded by Commissions LaMere, to construct a basic, class <br />5 access road and parking area without any trees, with the approved $215,000 from the CIP. <br /> <br />Commissioner Shryock stated that if this was constructed with class 5 materials, she felt there <br />should be some effort made to stop cars from driving onto the fields like staking and roped <br />fencing. She stated that she would also like it made clear that the park was under construction. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/June 12, 2003 <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.