My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/23/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 04/23/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:27:55 PM
Creation date
4/30/2019 4:16:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/23/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vice Chairperson VanScoy questioned how close the developer was to selling the commercial <br />parcel. <br />Mr. Riesler stated the sale of the property was being negotiated. <br />Vice Chairperson VanScoy inquired if the potential business owner would be willing to attend a <br />public workshop meeting in order to address the concerns that were raised at this meeting. <br />Mr. Riesler stated he believed this would be possible after a purchase agreement was in place. <br />Commissioner Surma commented he did not want to see an autobody shop or other auto use <br />within this development. He explained he would rather see a nice restaurant on this corner. <br />Vice Chairperson VanScoy asked if a PUD would allow for a higher density. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill commented both residential areas were within the <br />City's acceptable limits. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff stated ignoring the business aspect of the development, he believed <br />the flow of the remainder of the project made a lot of sense. He explained he liked how this <br />development transitioned into the adjacent neighborhood. <br />Commissioner Gengler agreed and stated she did not have a strong feeling regarding the attached <br />or detached townhomes. <br />Commissioner Surma requested the representative from Village Bank address the Commission. <br />The Village Bank representative stated they had no comments at this time. <br />Vice Chairperson VanScoy indicated he supported the general approach of the development with <br />respect to the R-2 and R-3, noting there were concerns with the safety of having an autobody <br />shop within this development. <br />The general consensus of the Commission was to direct the developer to proceed with the <br />Preliminary Plat. <br />6.02: Review Sketch Plan for 6080 Highway 10; Case of Village Bank (Project #18-163) <br />Presentation <br />City Planner McGuire Brigl presented the staff report stating the purpose of this case is to review <br />a sketch plan submitted by Village Bank for 6080 Highway 10 NW for a 14-lot residential <br />subdivision. The applicant proposes 50-foot wide, R-2 Detached Villa lots. He noted the <br />purpose of sketch plan review is to provide the applicant high-level feedback and pertinent <br />information to inform and expedite the preliminary plat process. Staff reported the proposed <br />Planning Commission/March 7, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.