My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/23/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 04/23/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:27:55 PM
Creation date
4/30/2019 4:16:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/23/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Shryock stated that she believes that this process should continue. She noted <br />that the feedback from residents that she has received is that they would like more information. <br />She stated that she would like more input from the Charter Commission and how the properties <br />that have been assessed would be handled should franchise fees go forward. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that he would also like to hear more and have this go forward. He <br />stated that at the meeting he attended, the strongest proponent for franchise fees were residents <br />that have been assessed. He stated that there is data on the assessment process and residents <br />have been vocal on their dislike for assessments. He stated that his biggest takeaway from the <br />meeting he attended was the cost savings that would be provided through franchise fees, as that <br />would be a cost savings for all taxpayers. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that he would also like additional information on how the <br />properties that have been assessed would be handled. He stated that the residents that he has <br />spoken to have expressed support for franchise fees. <br />Councilmember Heinrich stated that she has received mixed feedback, almost a 50/50 split. She <br />was unsure if going forward in the process would help the Council make the decision. She asked <br />why the decision is just not made on the information that has been given. She stated that she is <br />not comfortable with the open house meeting format that has occurred thus far. She noted that <br />her opinion was that the open house was a sales pitch for franchise fees rather than an open <br />house. She commented that residents opposed to franchise fees were afraid to raise their hand as <br />they felt their opinion would be shot down. She stated that if more public outreach efforts occur, <br />she would prefer a different format. She was unsure if she had a clear position on whether this <br />should move forward. She did not feel that the community has been educated enough, and felt <br />that more education and outreach need to occur. She stated that a part of her thinks the Council <br />is going to make the decision anyways, so the decision should just be made. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that education will be a huge component, explaining what the <br />difference would mean to residents. She stated that perhaps something can show the difference <br />people would pay comparing an assessment to franchise fees. <br />Mayor LeTourneau stated that the City is still very early in the process and this seems to be a <br />milestone in the process. He agreed that if the Council chooses to move forward there would be <br />more work to do. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she believed that financial information would be part of <br />the discussion. She stated that she has a different perspective, as she owns a smaller portion of <br />property and with the franchise fee; she would not have the same benefit as others. She stated <br />that she does not believe churches and schools should have to pay. She explained that churches <br />and schools have members that belong to the community and those residents are already paying <br />taxes or would be paying franchise fees for their homes. She stated that there is a portion of <br />people that do not have utilities and asked how that would be equal. She stated that this is a <br />regressive tax, as there is already a property tax. She stated that she would like additional <br />information on financials, including the franchise fee and how this would look on the taxes. She <br />asked what is being prioritized above roads currently. She stated that she is looking forward to <br />City Council Work Session / April 9, 2019 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.