My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 02/18/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2003
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 02/18/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:29:12 PM
Creation date
5/2/2019 11:37:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
02/18/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
width standards. Ideally, a n urban residential street might provide s pace for parking on both <br />sides and through traffic in both directions. A typical traffic through lane is generally designed to <br />be 12 feet wide. On street parking lanes varies between 6 to 9 feet. A diagram was presented <br />indicating an ideal cross-section for a residential City street and illustrated a requirement of 42 <br />feet from back of curb to back of curb. Realizing that the ideal section illustrated in Figure A <br />does have adverse environmental and social impacts, the current City standard has sealed back <br />the width demands from this idealized section. They compared that illustration to the current <br />City standards. Reducing three feet from the travel lanes and two feet from the parking lanes is a <br />significant compression over that of the idealized street section. This standard functions <br />satisfactorily because of the fact that parking on both sides of the street is a relatively infrequent <br />event, and free parking lanes give flexibility to the street use. With the proposal by the developer <br />to prohibit parking on one side of each residential street, Staff would be supportive of reducing <br />the street section to 28 feet wide. The difference from current City sections is the elimination of <br />a six-foot parking lane, and an increase in one foot in each traffic lane. The increase in travel <br />lane width is deemed necessary to compensate for the loss of flexibility provided by the second <br />parking lane. During winter months snow is plowed only to the gutter line. Furthermore during <br />snowy periods, high snow banks result in the loss of up to several feet along the pavement edge <br />and vehicles tend to park farther into the street to allow passengers to exit the vehicle. These <br />conditions were observed to some degree during the recent bus trip to Liberty on the Lake in <br />Stillwater. The developer is also proposing to have one-way streets with parking restricted on <br />both sides. This will occur in two locations, on the main entry street and on the eastern street <br />with a large green space separating northbound and southbound traffic. Since all additional lanes <br />have been eliminated, there is no flexibility left in the roadway section. Careful consideration <br />must be given for emergency situations, including snow, disabled vehicles, road repairs, etc. <br />Staff supports a road width of 20 feet, which provides a six-foot area for emergencies. It was <br />noted that all of the sections shown illustrates the use of surmountable curb, which extends one <br />foot beyond the flow line of the gutter. The recommended street section may be further reduced <br />by using straight-back curb in place of surmountable. Since the width of the curb back is six <br />inches for straight-back curb, a one-half foot reduction may take for each curb line replaced with <br />straight-back curb. Staff recommended t hat t he following street reductions b e allowed i n t he <br />Village of Sunfish Lake subdivision. A) two~way streets with parking restricted on one side, 28 <br />feet and B) one way street with parking restricted on one side, 20 feet. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if they had addressed the turning radiuses. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson replied that the radiuses should be increased up to 25 to 30 feet <br />with the narrow streets. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired as to the two different types of curbs that could be used. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski explained that the advantage of a surmountable curb is that driveways <br />don't need to be identified when the curb is installed, but a straight back curb is generally a better <br />curb because it holds more water, but it has to be cut out for driveways. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/February 18, 2003 <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.