Laserfiche WebLink
Contaminant Source Inventory (PCSI) requirements, was received in the mail on April 8, 2019. <br /> Copies of the Scoping 2 Decision Notice and PCSI requirements were included in the packet. <br /> <br />the scope of work required to amend Part 2 of the WHPP, and the minimal amount of time <br />available to complete this work, Staff recommends enlisting an engineering consultant to <br />complete the work. The cities of Andover, and Anoka, who are also members of the Lower Rum <br />River Watershed Management Organization (LRRWMO), enlisted the services of Barr <br /> It is important to <br />note that Barr <br />comments on all WHPP Part 2 amendments. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby stated that Anoka and Andover used the same project manager from Barr <br />Engineering, Mr. John Greer, and both cities highly recommended him. Staff met with Mr. <br />Greer on Monday, April 8, 2019, to discuss his availability to assist the City of Ramsey with our <br />WHPP Part 2 amendments. Mr. Greer indicated he could assist the City with our Part 2 <br />amendments, and noted that while the timelines are tight, he felt that if data requests are <br />addressed in a timely manner the City should be able to meet the MDH deadline of October 6, <br />2019. Staff therefore requested that Barr Engineering submit a proposal for assisting the City of <br />Ramsey with its WHPP Part 2 amendments, including a not-to-exceed fee. Staff originally <br />estimated costs for hiring a consultant to assist with the Part 2 amendments to be in the range of <br />$15,000 to $30,000, depending on the scope of work identified in the MDH Scoping 2 Decision <br />Notice. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby stated that on April 10, 2019, Barr Engineering submitted their proposal to <br />-to-exceed fee of $25,100. <br />He stated that staff has reviewed Barr Engineering proposed not-to-exceed fee and feels it is <br />reasonable based on the required scope of work. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer IV Linton provided an update on the watershed-based funding meetings that he <br />has attended. He noted that if a project was not included in the City/LRRWMO plan prior to the <br />availability of the watershed-based funding, the project would not be eligible. He noted that the <br />primary focus of watershed-based funding is for stormwater projects, rather than drinking water <br />projects. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby stated that staff would like to enter into the contract with Barr Engineering <br />and noted that funds are available in the professional services water fund. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated that the comment was made that the timing was tight, but Barr <br />Engineering could meet that deadline and asked if the timeline impacts the cost. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby noted that the time does not have an impact on the cost. He stated that <br />timing is dependent on data requests that may have to be made from other agencies. He noted <br />that if the deadline is not met, the City could request an extension. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee / April 16, 2019 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br />