Laserfiche WebLink
Economic Development Authority (EDA) 4. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 06/13/2019 <br />By: Sean Sullivan, Community <br />Development <br />Title: <br />Review Real Estate Management Strategy for City Owned Land <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to review the City's strategy for real estate management for City Owned Parcels. <br />The EDA met in January 2019 and also discussed at a Joint Work Session with the City Council on February 26, <br />2019. The EDA then met again on April 11, 2019 to discuss the matter further. On April 11, 2019, the EDA <br />recommended that Staff work with CBRE to revise the current contract. Key points of discussion included, but were <br />not limited to the following. <br />1. Removing parcels outside of the COR from the listing agreement <br />2. Adding language that would reduce, or eliminate commission for leads that were not generated by CBRE <br />(Clear-cut City leads, etc.) <br />A proposed contract with revised language is attached for review. <br />Additional Background <br />The City has been engaged in a contract with CBRE since January 28, 2014 to list and market City owned <br />properties in the COR and other areas. The City and CBRE have executed multiple amendments to the contract with <br />the latest being a one year contract from July 31, 2018-July 30, 2019. Staff has found CBRE agent Brian Pankratz <br />to be available, engaged, knowledgeable and helpful when it comes to marketing city owned parcels. CBRE utilizes <br />many proven marketing methods such as: <br />• Real Estate signs on site <br />• Online listings such as MNCAR (internet) <br />• Connection to the broker community <br />With the current contract coming up for consideration for renewal in July 2019 (can be canceled with 30 <br />day notice), Staff believes it is important to review the current contract, its terms and conditions, and to <br />determine if a renewal is prudent or to explore other options. The original contract and pertinent <br />amendments are attached to this case. <br />Having a company like CBRE market city properties to its broker community and clients has its advantages. CBRE <br />has a good reputation within the broker community. The maintenance and updating of marketing materials by <br />CBRE including signage and MNCAR listings is convenient for Staff and access to current market data is helpful. <br />Based on city records the City has closed on ten properties, with four more pending (Parcel 42 - RGH Ramsey LLC, <br />Parcel 45 - PSD, LLC, Parcel 13a - Capstone off Puma and 52b AEON - Phase 2 that CBRE has listed since 2014. <br />On May 3, 2019 the City closed on Parcel 6 (Muni Site) for a 15 lot SFR development by Meadow Creek Builders. <br />Currently, the City has sixteen City owned parcels listed with CBRE including six under contract. Eleven of these <br />properties are in the COR and the rest are scattered across the community. <br />In late 2018, Anoka County has added a regional economic development presence to Anoka County as presented to <br />the EDA last year. The City of Ramsey is included in this partnership and has the opportunity to list its properties <br />on MNCAR at a nominal cost. This is a feature is also provided by CBRE as part of its listing contract free of cost. <br />Anoka County does not provide signage on site for marketing and does not have the reputation or experience of a <br />CBRE in the broker community at this time. It is difficult to fully compare CBRE to the new Anoka County <br />