Laserfiche WebLink
per the applicable provisions of Chapter 8 of the City Charter, the City's Special Assessment <br /> Policy, and Minnesota Statute Chapter 429. <br /> Councilmember Kuzma asked what would happen if the residents object to the assessment once <br /> the project is complete, if the study is not done, specifically whether that appraisal report would <br /> then be an additional expense. <br /> City Engineer Westby stated that if an objection is filed there is a process to be followed. He <br /> stated that in this case there would not be an appraisal report. He stated that the assessment that <br /> was adopted in November is reasonable and comparable to previous projects and therefore he did <br /> not foresee any issues if the assessments remain at $4,500 or below. He stated that if needed, a <br /> single property appraisal could be done but did not anticipate needing that unless a large <br /> assessment is proposed. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked the benefit to action two, noting that the School District could <br /> then say that they would not drop off children. <br /> City Engineer Westby confirmed that the cul-de-sac would not need to be reconstructed but the <br /> School District would then be forced to find an alternate route. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove stated that she would support action one as that would support future <br /> home sales and safety for children in the neighborhood. <br /> Councilmember Heinrich stated that this case would also forgo completion of the special benefit <br /> appraisal study and that cost savings would be credited towards the proposed assessment amount <br /> for homeowners. <br /> City Engineer Westby stated that the assessments proposed in November would have been <br /> $3,919 but the bids were higher than anticipated. He noted that the proposed assessment amount <br /> then increased to $6,600. He stated that because a similar project had an assessment of$4,500, <br /> he would recommend keeping the assessment at $4,500 rather than increasing from $3,919 to <br /> $6,600. <br /> Mayor LeTourneau asked if in the past the City has made adjustments to an assessment that <br /> ended up coming in higher than anticipated. <br /> City Engineer Westby stated that has not happened in the past. He stated that the bids came in <br /> higher than anticipated and therefore staff would lean towards assessing a lesser amount than the <br /> $6,600, as the originally proposed assessment amount was $3,919. <br /> Mayor LeTourneau stated that he would not want to make a decision on the assessment amount <br /> at this time, noting that the issue could set precedent in the future. He noted that a discussion <br /> could be had in the future but would not want to make a commitment at this time. <br /> Lisa Monsrude, 5725 180th Ln NW, stated that her children catch the bus and hoped that the City <br /> would widen the cul-de-sac in conjunction with this project. <br /> City Council/May 14,2019 <br /> Page 6 of 12 <br />