Laserfiche WebLink
CC Work Session 2. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 06/11/2019 <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Local Road Funding <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to update the Council with more information and research on local road funding. On <br />May 28, information was provided to the City Council and, after discussion, additional information was requested. <br />• A list of responses to frequently asked questions (FAQs) raised during the March public input meetings was <br />provided. <br />• An estimate of revenue from franchise fees, based upon information from the utility companies, was <br />provided to the Council. <br />• An analysis of road funding options on local properties based upon value, considering property taxes versus <br />franchise fees was reviewed and a revised version is attached. <br />• The financial impact of a rebate policy to address properties that received assessments over the past 5 years <br />was reviewed. <br />• A draft generic ordinance is attached for consideration of policy issues such as the dedication of fees to <br />transportation, and assessment rebate program, and a sunset provision. It is generic such that the utility <br />company name, fee amounts and dates are left blank. <br />• Consider possible ballot questions, either an advisory question or specific ordinance amendments. The <br />August Special Election is too soon to post a question, and the November 2019 Special election is still a <br />possibility to consider a city wide ballot question, but the election would need to be expanded to include all <br />City wards. <br />• Staff has met with the Charter Commission and a committee of the Charter Commission to consider this <br />issue. The Charter Commission has asked for additional research regarding the use of franchise fees in <br />Minnesota and other cold climate states for road maintenance. The University of Minnesota is expected to <br />submit a proposal to consider the research in which the Charter Commission has expressed an interest. <br />The Council may choose to introduce the franchise fee ordinances, followed by adoption, similar to the process the <br />City followed in 2003. When introduced, the ordinances would be redrafted to include the necessary information. <br />The City's Charter provides a unique opportunity for the public to petition against adopted ordinances. Chapter 5, <br />Section 5.7 of the City's Charter (Referendum) reads as follows: Prior to the date an ordinance takes effect, it may <br />be subjected to referendum by a petition, which shall state at the head of each page, or attached thereto, the exact <br />text of the ordinance to be considered by the voters. If the petition is found to be sufficient under the provisions of <br />Section 5.3 of this chapter, the said ordinance shall thereby be prevented from going into operation, and the subject <br />matter of the petition shall be placed on the ballot at the next election occurring in the city. If no election is to occur <br />within 120 days after the filing of the petition, the council shall call a special election to be held within such period, <br />providing the petition has been found to be sufficient. If a majority of the voters voting thereon vote for the <br />ordinance contained in the petition it shall take effect immediately upon certification of the election results by the <br />councilPlease note that the language relating to the election occurring in 120 days is obsolete because of <br />uniform election dates set by State legislature. The Charter Commission is in the process of amending the <br />Charter language to be compliant. The election would be set for the next available uniform date. <br />Following receipt of a petition, staff must determine if there are a sufficient number of signatures. Charter language <br />states the following: Section 5.3 Determination of Sufficiency. The committee shall file the completed petition in <br />the office of the city clerk. The required number of signatures for initiative and referendum shall be at least twenty <br />percent of the total number of registered voters at the time of the last citywide election. Note: The last citywide <br />