Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Fulstrom stated originally, this was part of the long-term goals for his home, but noted it <br />would be more cost effective to have living space within the new garage. <br />Chairperson Bauer reported Commission Anderson had concerns regarding how the new garage <br />would fit into the character of the neighborhood. <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated he feared how the neighbors would react to the new, very large <br />garage structure. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff stated there were other lots that had space next to them. He explained <br />he feared that by approving this request, the City would be receiving additional requests for large <br />accessory structures. <br />Mr. Fulstrom stated the other empty lots were owned by a single homeowner. <br />City Planner McGuire Brigl asked if the Planning Commission would be more supportive of the <br />proposed garage if it was two -stories and looked more like a house. <br />Commissioner Johnson stated he could support this. <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented he would not support it as the character of the neighborhood <br />would be altered and he could not support the large garage. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill explained the project did not have strong consensus <br />from the Planning Commission. He reported staff could work with the applicant on architectural <br />renderings in concept form. He indicated this item could be further discussed at a future <br />worksession meeting with the neighbors being invited. <br />The Commission supported moving forward in this direction. <br />8.04: Review Concept Plan for Anderson Dahlen <br />Presentation <br />Community Development Director Gladhill presented the Staff Report stating the City has <br />received a concept plan for a second building for Anderson Dahlen to meet their expanding <br />building needs. This would be a second building/campus on a portion of 14251 Jaspar St NW. <br />The site is currently owned by the City, with a majority of the site reserved for a future Public <br />Work Campus. Approximately nine (9) acres is available for industrial development. The intent <br />of this case is as follows: <br />• Does the Planning Commission want Staff to get this project to the finish line? If so, Staff <br />will chart a course with future cases on exactly how to get there? <br />• Are there any red flags in the concept plan? <br />Planning Commission/April 4, 2019 <br />Page 10 of 15 <br />