My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/23/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 07/23/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:31:48 PM
Creation date
7/23/2019 2:12:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/23/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
794
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 07/23/2019 <br />Submitted For: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />By: Eric Maass, Community Development <br />4. 8. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #19-154 Approving Site Plan for Suite Living (Project #19-121); Case of Hampton Properties <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The City has received an application from Hampton Companies (the "Applicant") for a Site Plan for Suite Living, a <br />proposed thirty-two (32) unit, assisted living facility located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Jaspar <br />Street and 139th Lane (the "Subject Property"). The City Council may recall reviewing a Sketch Plan earlier this <br />year for Rivenwick 3rd Addition, which was to be a mixed of townhomes, commercial, and this assisted living <br />facility. This project was shifted east, adjacent to the existing townhome development to the east, to take advantage <br />of the fact that the public road is in place already. <br />Notification: <br />Notifications of this previous Public Hearing were sent via Standard US Mail to Property Owners within 700 feet of <br />the Property, as reflected by Anoka County Property Records. A notice was published in the Anoka Union Herald, <br />the City's official newspaper. Notification has not been provided for this meeting. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />General Information <br />The Subject Property is about 2.14 acres in size and is located south of Highway 10, east of Ramsey Boulevard, <br />and north of 139th Lane. The Subject Property is zoned MU-PUD (Mixed Use - Planned Unit Development), which <br />allows for a mixture of both residential and commercial uses. This specific project is being reviewed utilizing the <br />standards of the R-3 Residential (High Density) District. <br />As proposed the site plan adheres to the dimensional bulk standards required of the R-3 Residential (High Density) <br />District for building coverage, setbacks, height limitations, and exterior materials. <br />Parking <br />The R-3 Residential District typically requires 2.5 off-street parking spaces one of which is enclosed, for <br />multiple -family dwellings. However, the City Code is silent specific to assisted living and memory care. For a 32 <br />unit facility, this would typically require 80 parking spaces, 32 of which would need to be enclosed. Staff does not <br />believe this to be realistic or necessary for the proposed senior living facility. <br />Given the quasi -residential, quasi -commercial nature of the proposed use and per past practice for this type of use, <br />Staff has applied a combination of commercial and medical use parking standards, rather than typical residential <br />parking minimums. The off-street parking ordinance sets a minimum parking space standard of one (1) space per <br />four (4) hospital beds plus an additional space for each employee. Based on 32 units, a minimum of 8 parking stalls <br />plus one stall per employee would be required. The Applicant indicated that ten (10) employees would be the most <br />on site at any given time. As such it is Staffs opinion that a minimum of 18 parking spots be provided. The site plan <br />currently proposes 20 off-street parking spaces. <br />Noise Study <br />The Applicant was required to conduct a noise study on the site due to the proximity of the site to U.S. Highway 10. <br />The recommendation from that noise study included moving a shared outdoor use area from the northeast side of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.