Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 07/23/2019 <br />Submitted For: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />By: Eric Maass, Community Development <br />7. 2. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #19-180 Approving Appeal for a Denied Variance to Bufferyard Setbacks and Resolution <br />#19-152 Approving Development Agreement; Case of Delta ModTech (Project #19-108) <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to: <br />1. Consider an Appeal to a Denied Variance <br />2. Approve Standard Development Agreement <br />The City received an application from Delta ModTech (the "Applicant") for a variance to the buffer yard <br />requirements for industrial businesses adjacent to residential properties as well as review of the proposed <br />development agreement and associated agreements for the development project. The Planning Commission <br />reviewed the variance request and held a public hearing at its meeting on July 10, 2019. The Planning Commission <br />denied the variance request. The Applicant has since submitted an appeal of the Planning Commissions decision to <br />the City Council. Staff acknowledges that this is a unique action for the City Council, and will update this case with <br />information as requested. Staff is providing baseline information, but will add additional information as needed to <br />support policy decision -making. <br />In addition to the standard setback, bufferyards are required greenspace areas intended to provide additional <br />screening and transition of businesses that are adjacent to residential areas. The Subject Property is adjacent to a 3 <br />acre residential parcel which contains a single home but is zoned as R-3 High Density Residential. The adjacent <br />property was originally part of the zoning amendment to rezone the area to E-3 Employment however the adjacent <br />property was removed for consideration of possible high density housing which resulted in the R-3 zoning <br />designation. <br />The bufferyard requirement for E-3 adjacent to R-3 is 60 feet with a 30% increase in plantings within the bufferyard. <br />Notification: <br />Letters were sent via Standard US Mail to all Property Owners within 700 feet of the Property regarding the <br />previous Public Hearing. The Property Owner List was generated by the Anoka County Tax Database. The Public <br />Hearing Notice was also published in the Anoka County Union Herald. Notifications have not been provided for <br />this meeting. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Variance Appeal <br />Overview <br />The Applicant is currently showing an access drive that infringes upon the 60 foot buffer yard area. A setback of 40 <br />feet from the property line to the proposed access drive is currently shown with the remaining 20 feet of buffer yard <br />area utilized by an access drive. The bufferyard requirement for E-3 adjacent to R-3 is 60 feet with a 30% increase <br />in plantings within the bufferyard. Of key note, the proposed building is setback approximately 190 feet from the <br />shared property line, much further than required. Only the drive aisle encroaches by 20 feet. <br />When contemplating a Variance, the City must determine that there is a practical difficulty in complying with the <br />zoning ordinance, as defined as the following: <br />