My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/23/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 07/23/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:31:48 PM
Creation date
7/23/2019 2:12:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/23/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
794
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
other options are different, they may be considered more traditional interchange options, but also <br />have additional cost. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that there is strong support for the grade <br />separation for the rail crossing and highway, with some concern with the right-in/right-out <br />option. He stated that there has been a request from Lano to bring the right-in/right-out closer to <br />their business. <br />Ms. Bersaw stated that they are still planning for the frontage road between Ramsey Boulevard <br />and Sunfish. She noted that there is a high cost estimated at this time, but that cost could be <br />reduced as time moves forward as that estimate also includes RALF costs. She highlighted <br />another frontage road option along the Tungsten district, which was carried forward from the <br />2014 study. She stated that there have been discussions with the businesses in those locations on <br />the functionality of that frontage road and the heavy equipment that would be moving on the <br />road. She explained that the cost estimates included for all options are in 2025 numbers because <br />that is when Anoka would be completed and is a more accurate estimate of when work could <br />possibly begin. She referenced the west end plans, which have been on hold until there is further <br />input from Elk River and MnDOT on the future plans for that corridor. She noted that the plan <br />thus far includes an interim safety improvement for a minimal cost that would simply formalize <br />the movements that most people are already making in that area. She stated that she will be <br />providing a similar update to the County Board tomorrow and then there is another TAC meeting <br />later this week. She stated that they are nearing the end of the phase one planning and the next <br />step would be to continue on to phase two, which includes funding strategies. <br />Acting Mayor Riley stated that this Ramsey portion of Highway 10 is the third piece of three and <br />would complete this section of the highway. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if there is room for expansion of Highway 10 lanes, should a <br />third lane continue. <br />Ms. Bersaw stated that the Anoka project has squeezed enough room where a third lane could be <br />added under the interchanges in the future. She stated that perhaps Ramsey would plan for a <br />similar thing so that option is not precluded in the future. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that the Council consensus will be conveyed <br />to the County Board and TAC this week. <br />2.02: Staff Update on Water Supply System Request for Proposals <br />City Engineer Westby reviewed the staff report. <br />Acting Mayor Riley asked how the system would be modeled if there has not been a water <br />supply system before. <br />City Engineer Westby provided additional details on water infrastructure. He confirmed that it <br />has not been done on a system wide basis before. <br />City Council Work Session / July 16, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.