My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/11/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2019
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/11/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:41:21 PM
Creation date
7/29/2019 8:47:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
07/11/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Why is this project important? <br />-The City is Ramsey had a population of approximately 10,100 residents in 1980 and was a <br />predominantly an agriculture-based economy. The City grew to 18,510 by 2000, and 26,000 <br />residents by 2016. The City is projected to see a further 50% growth in population by the year <br />2040 (39,000 people). Looking over the horizon we see an increase in electric vehicles and <br />electric vehicle charging, electrified homes and businesses, and autonomous and connected <br />vehicles. With population growth and increase in density and diversity in land use types and <br />economic sectors comes a greater need to remain vigilant as sound environmental, social, and <br />fiscal stewards of our community’s resources. Through our recent participation in the University <br />of Minnesota’s “Resilient Communities Project” (2017-2018) we identified ways to further our <br />strategic planning priorities, which include financial stability, a connected community, smart <br />citizen-focused government, and an efficient organization. We view the Brightfield <br />redevelopment project as having great potential to support these strategic priorities, which <br />support the short and long term livability, prosperity, and resilience of our community. <br /> <br />What challenges has the community faced? <br />-The closed landfill is an eye-sore and has historically had very limited redevelopment potential. <br />However, Solar PV development has emerged within the last 3 years as one of the only viable <br />options for redevelopment. The local electrical utility, Connexus Energy Cooperative, initially <br />had interest in developing a “solar + storage” development at the site, but was stymied by state <br />agencies, which led them to developing at a different site in the City. The MN Pollution Control <br />Agency and the MN Management & Budget Office are extremely wary of this sort of <br />development for federal tax law, state statutory, federal and state financial regulation, state <br />agency regulation, staff time allotment, general obligation bonding safe harbors and <br />allowances, private investment and ownership, and technical risk considerations. The site is also <br />owned by the MN Pollution Control Agency, and the State would like to own the REC’s <br />generated by any renewable development at the site, but that could negate the financial <br />viability for interested investors/developers. Additionally, the site is regulated by the City of <br />Ramsey’s local zoning code. The combination of these areas lacking clarity has stifled the ability <br />for the city and other actors to legitimately analyze what sort of finance, ownership, PPA, <br />virtual net metering, net metering, and operations & maintenance considerations would allow <br />for the development of the site. <br /> <br />-MPCA: “A point to keep in mind when planning a location for solar is that the waste is currently <br />undergoing active remediation and management and will be into the future. Because of this we <br />do not allow anything to be installed on the landfill cap, and due to the methane that is being <br />generated during the decomposition process there is a 200 foot setback requirement from the <br />waste. \[However\] The program is in the process of re-evaluating what types of installations <br />could be workable on waste areas. The restrictions outlined below are open for discussion.” <br />MPCA’s Mission: Protect and improve the environment and enhance human health. <br /> <br /> <br />Why is this reuse strategy the one chosen? <br />-The City has been home to this closed landfill for years and has attempted to find ways in which <br />the land, which would be quite valuable and ripe for development were it not for the closed <br />landfill, could be redeveloped. The Landfill was operated as a dump from 1967 until it was <br />permitted in 1972 and closed in 1993. The MPCA took over responsibility for the Landfill in 1997 <br />when the MPCA and Waste Management signed the Landfill Cleanup Agreement and the MPCA <br />issued the Notice of Compliance. Since 1997, the “Brightfield” concept for redevelopment has <br />been the most feasible and realistic one to date. It has tentative support in the community, is <br />something the electric utility is interested in, and is something we have explored a pathway to <br />since 2014. (“Closed Landfill Use Plan, Anoka-Ramsey Landfill” page 5, page 15: <br />http://156.142.212.178:8080/docs/2015/PR/20150409_1055/5257_Anoka- <br />Ramsey%20CLUP%20Report.pdf) <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.