Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Jim Overtoom, 16660 jaSPer StreOt,: stated they .are at the meeting to talk abpu~ :the <br />Comprehensive Plan. He stated:the City. Spent imany years and much discussion to com~ Up'%ith: <br />a Comprehensive Plan.. He stat~ sixty daYs ag°, they received a petition from a d :er <br />resident to change that plan.: He started, t~ey need to study what the ~s to the'~' <br />Comprehensive Plan mean to the Cityl He did not feel a sixty,day review for.~i~..n, dment to <br />the Comprehensive Plan is adequate. ' .~?;!}'!"':~': :" . <br /> <br />Mr. Overtoom stated a Comprehensive Plan change for these de~?lo will changdi:th~. <br />hvabd~ty of Ramsey. He stated they are requesting the ar a~g-5~ [on to deny <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Sketch Plan be, ~:~ G S;~¢~i st~e. <br /> <br />Mr. Jeff Uecker, 17121 Vanohte Street, :stated they ~ent a 1.ong time discussing <br />Comprehensive Plan change and inow they are gOing more ti~ediscussing amending i~":::" <br />again when they should be plann, ing for the he,ct losing all of the <br />rural character by the use of the density, He s.. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Johnson stated they are °nlY a recommending :to the City Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Gary Smith, 16821 Garnet the ten-year ............. ~as submitted <br /> He stated instead of ng this plan, they <br /> e did not thi~~ deVelopment made <br /> <br />three years later than when it was <br />should be concentrating on <br />sense. He explained the City <br />adding more homes. He <br />overcrowded and nothing can bedone <br />leave the amendment as it is <br />more homes on of~6wn, <br /> <br />ten years <br /> <br /> Mr. Chuck HedStrom, 71 <br /> towards t~.d~velopment i <br /> since, he!'m0¥ed into <br /> inadequate <br /> the land and ar~a~, <br /> his home. City <br />i~::!!i.~ill n°t have to hool~ <br /> hook uP to City sewer <br /> <br /> cdngested roads instead of <br /> overcrowded and is still <br /> He thought they should <br /> ~s. He stated by adding <br /> adding to the problems, not solving them. <br /> <br /> felt Traprock is the first step in moving <br />described the history of his neighborhood <br />Stated there is no transition in the lot sizes,' <br /> more automobiles; the ecological impact on <br /> <br /> is approved, City sewer and water will pass by <br /> he mOuld have to hook up within two years, the City Charter says he <br /> he would like some assurance that he would not have to <br /> system is inadequate. <br /> <br />Mr. Hedstrom!Stated ho:ii~.appreei'ated Mr. Peters°n meeting with the neighborhoods. The best <br />argument he h~i';.for Mr. Peterson's development: is he is holding twenty acres of what is being <br />proposed for a fi'iend. He asked the Commissi°n to refuse the request of Mr. Peterson to amend <br />the ComprehenSiCe Plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Bob Hanborg, 15755 TraprOck Street NW; stated he was encouraged by the number of <br />peOple at the meeting speaking uP~ He stated what became evident to him is it seems like the cart <br />is getting put before the horse when this_development may not even take place because the clean <br />up may cost more than expected..He wondered What would happen then, would the amendment <br /> <br />Plan~ning CommisSion/March 3, 2005 <br /> ': ~ page6~of22 <br /> <br /> <br />