Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Paul Schmaltz, 1655 Quartz,I stated :there iS nothing for the new east/west connection of the <br />City. He stated this is the missing piec. e to the puzzle. They are rushing into this without <br />examining the roadWay positio~g in ~e CiR. He indicated he would like to see more <br />consideration given to ComprehenSive Plan:Amendments. <br /> <br />Mr. Bud Augst wondered what thetime frame was from previous zoning was. <br /> <br />Community Development Directgr Trudgeon sta~d there ~''~ <br />parcel of land. He stated they periodically ~pdate the <br /> <br />Mr. Augst stated it must: have taken some <br /> <br />Community Development Director <br />months ago. <br /> <br />,ning changes done to this <br /> changes. <br /> <br />months ago. <br /> <br />seven <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated wheat they were <br />reviewing the Comprehensive PI~; ~ ~ <br />correct mistakes. He stated the c .k~ge in <br /> <br />Mr. Fred Lincow, 6951 167th Avertue~ <br />the sketch plan. He stated 167th wi:Il <br /> <br />result of when they were <br /> map was redone to <br /> ~roperties in the City. <br /> <br />at a r6ad map before approving <br /> <br />Mr. Tony Lee, 16685 Gamett, S~l~ <br />moved here three years ago be~of:th~ <br />consider allowing only onT~ ~cre. ! <br />Mr. Joe Smith, 16821 G~~stated When the site plan is looked at, there should be <br />consideration for ,tra~itionin~ ~Im'ently there is none. He' stated he lives very close to a <br />cul-de-sac and!,i~!~e~.~aen this ~~ traffic will go to his road. He stated that as a <br />reg~stered~:votev~m~~[.~s~sod the amendment of the Comprehensive Plan <br />and~:.~;B[~Ookfield Ad ' <br />~'~!~[ie Leverns, 7009 l~[[enue NW, ~stated these developments need to be looked at <br />¢l~ser.:;!S,h~ [!~ought it was un~q~l~for to mn:seWer up to these developments when people south <br />of there?~ll3npt.:have it until~ll. She!asked ~hy the lots needed to be so small. She stated <br />there a/-b: '~i'[6~}¢r!things !:~ to be looked Jat that have not been looked at before. She <br />thought the~ r~d~i]~-~0~lo6~e entire :city and ~not just theone development. She thought the <br />development was!t~0::~~otsifind the roads needed to be looked at. <br /> <br />Mr. M~chael Elhs, 170~ <br /> ' ' "' ~ 166th Avenue NW, stated he has a number of problems with this <br />development. One is the transition of homes; there is also a traffic factor. He did not feel the <br />neighborhood could handle the traffic. He stated ~the' schools are already over crowded and they <br />need a high school. He recommended that: the :Commission not approve the Amendment or <br />Sketch Plan. <br /> <br /> in Ramsey. He stated they <br />City. He thought the City should <br /> <br />Plan ~n~Jng Com~miSsi°n/March 3, 2005 <br /> Page 13 of 23 <br /> · <br /> <br /> <br />