Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Paul Schmaltz, 1655 QuartZi stated there i~ ;nothing for the new east/west connection of the <br />City. He stated this is the mis:sing piece to ,the puzzle. They are rushing into this without <br />examining the roadway positi0~ng ~ the City. He indicated he would like to see more <br />consideration given to Comprehensive P1an Amendments. <br /> <br />Mr. Bud Augst wondered what the time frame Was from previous zoning was. <br /> <br />Community Development DireCtor Trudge0n stated therel ,ning changes done to this <br />parcel of land. He stated they pe~iodieallY!uPdaie the ges. <br /> <br />Mr. Augst stated it must have taken some ~tUdy',l months ago. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon, seven <br />months ago. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated what theY ,werei result of when they were <br />reviewing the Comprehensive Plan; s0m~ :he map was redone to <br />correct mistakes. He stated the ; in the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Fred Lincow, 6951 167th Aeenue~ at a road map before approving <br />the sketch plan. He stated 167m Will <br /> <br />Mr. Tony Lee, 16685 <br />moved here three years ago <br />consider allowing only 'one <br /> <br /> f life in Ramsey. He stated they <br />!-City. He thought the City should <br /> <br />Mr. Joe Smith, 16821 <br /> <br /> reg <br /> and the'B~;6kfield -'~"': <br /> <br />NfS~;Pattie Leverns, 7009 <br />'~6i[~S~?S~e thought it was <br />of thefe ~il)not have it Until <br />there are,' ~ <br />thought <br /> <br />stated When the site plan is looked at, there should be <br />there is none. He stated he lives very close to a <br />will go to his road. He stated that as a <br />:ed the amendment of the Comprehensive Plan <br /> <br /> NW, stated' these developments need to be looked at <br /> to run seWer up to these developments when people south <br /> She aSked why the lots needed to be so small. She stated <br /> t° be looked at that have not been looked at before. She <br />entire CitY and not just the one development. She thought the <br /> : <br /> <br />development was' ~ and the t°adsneeded to be looked at. <br /> <br />Mr. Michael Elhs, ~0'1 166 ~Avenue Nw,:Smted he has a number of problems with this <br />development. One is ~e transition of homes; ~ere is also a traffic hctor. He did not feel the <br />neighborhood could handle the traffic. He stated the schools are already over crowded and they <br />need a high school. He recommended that ihe Commission not approve the'Amendment or <br />Sketch Plan. <br /> <br /> Plaanin~ Co~miSS{°n~areh 3, 2005 <br /> ~age 13 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />