06/17/19 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

developer had obtained extensions on both fronts. The current proposal has some slight changes from what was previously approved and thus, the applicant is going through the review process for Site Plan. He recommended that the Board approve the proposed Landscape Plan, contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review Letter. Board Member Hiatt asked if there would be security fencing. City Planner Anderson replied that although the previously approved plan had fencing, this applicant is not proposing any as access cannot be gained to any of the storage units unless you are inside the building. He stated that there is a fire lane around the building for emergency purposes but that will be posted as not for public use. Motion by Board Member Hiatt and seconded by Board Member Covart to recommend approval of the proposed Landscape Plan, contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review Letter. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Valentine, Board Member Hiatt, Covart, Bernard, and Fetterley. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Madison and Moore. 5.03: Consider Landscape Plan Associated with the Site Plan for Name Brand Storage (Project No. 19-120); Case of Josh Peterson City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the City has received an application from Josh Peterson for a Minor Plat and Site Plan for a proposed self-storage facility located near the western boundary of the City, north of 156th Avenue south/southwest of BNSF railroad tracks. He recommended that the Board recommend approval of the proposed Landscape Plan, contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review Letter. Board Member Hiatt asked if there is an intention to expand the cul-de-sac. City Planner Anderson explained that the intention will be to eventually make the connection to Alpine Drive as part of the Highway 10 access management plan. Chairperson Valentine stated that it could be helpful for the Board to review the Highway 10 options that were recently reviewed at an open house, as that could help provide context for future planning cases that will be reviewed in that area. City Planner Anderson confirmed that he would attempt to add that item to the July or August meeting. City Councilmember Musgrove believed that there are upcoming meetings that will narrow down the choices as well. City Planner Anderson noted that he can provide updates as future meetings occur. He advised that interested members of the Board are welcome to attend the meetings as well. Motion by Board Member Covart and seconded by Board Member Fetterley to recommend approval of the proposed Landscape Plan, contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review Letter. Environmental Policy Board/June 17, 2019 Page 3 of 4