Laserfiche WebLink
CC Work Session 2. 3. <br />Meeting Date: 06/25/2019 <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Local Road Funding <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to update the Council with more information and research on local road funding. On <br />June 11, information was discussed with the City Council and, after discussion, additional information is provided. <br />• A revised calculation to demonstrate that the franchise fees collected would be in line with road maintenance <br />needs. Based upon this calculation, the franchise fee is proposed at $6 per utility per month. A comparison of <br />that fee to similar revenue collected via property tax is included. <br />• Attached is draft ordinancefor discussion. If the ordinance is introduced, it could be modified as necessary <br />based upon public discussion prior to final adoption. <br />• More information is below in regard to a local road funding study requested by the Charter Commission. The <br />Charter Commission has asked for additional research regarding the use of franchise fees in Minnesota and <br />other cold climate states for road maintenance. The University of Minnesota has submitted a proposal to <br />consider the research in which the Charter Commission has expressed an interest. A summary of that study is <br />below/ <br />Local Road Funding Study <br />Preliminary methodology: <br />Survey a list of 25 cities, selected at random (at least half outside the state of Minnesota) regarding how they <br />manage local road funding and maintenance. A in depth investigation would be done on six cities. These six case <br />studies would compare and contrast 2 for each type of funding mechanism --assessments, franchise fees and <br />property tax. Survey results from the larger group of 25 cities would be combined into a matrix, and identify <br />whether they use the property tax method, assessment method, franchise fees method, or alternative sources, or a <br />combination of methods. <br />The franchise fee information would include a ratio comparison of each city's fee to that city's assessed tax levy on <br />an average market valued residential property in that city (for example, average market valued residential property <br />is $220,000. Tax levy for city is $1000 annually on $220k value. Franchise fee imposed is $5 monthly or $60 <br />annually. $60/$1000 = 6%). <br />Research to include what other cities comparable in size and weather conditions are doing for road maintenance, <br />repair and reconstruction (note: weather correlates to similar salt use/freeze-thaw conditions). Explore a range of <br />solutions, not just focused on franchise fees as the solution. <br />Other information: <br />• Name of City (group by Metro and Non -metro, include a few from other cold weather states) <br />• Size of City: square miles/acres and population <br />• Miles of city roads maintained <br />Specific to Franchise Fees: <br />• What is the franchise fee dollar amount for single family residential? Commercial? <br />• How long has a franchise fee been in place? <br />• Does the fee have a dedicated use (e.g., road maintenance, parks, etc.) <br />• When was the last time the fee was raised? <br />• How often is the fee revised? <br />• Does the fee have a sunset provision? (i.e., does the fee automatically expire if the Council does not renew it) <br />• Does the fee have a cap on how much is collected (either individual or aggregate)? <br />