My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/09/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 07/09/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:31:02 PM
Creation date
8/29/2019 2:03:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/09/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Living would like to move forward now and that is the reason for the change, as there are not other <br />users yet for the other two uses. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if the applicant is comfortable with the recommendations from the <br />City. <br />Mr. Roessler stated that he was a bit confused as the previously approved concept included 80 <br />percent residential and 20 percent commercial and they would like that percentage rate to remain. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill clarified that the previous concept had R-2 against R- <br />2, whereas this concept has R-2 between Suite Living and the commercial. He noted that this <br />concept would place Suite Living against the existing R-2. <br />Chairperson Bauer explained that typically you try to transition between zoning districts rather <br />than placing low density between high density and commercial. <br />Mr. Roessler replied that Suite Living is not traditional high -density housing. He stated that if this <br />does not fit, they would not find a buyer for the residential parcel. He stated that there have been <br />a lot of residential developers interested in this layout. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that the zoning decision does not need to be <br />made at this time and Suite Living could move forward as proposed. <br />Mr. Roessler stated that although commercial development would be preferred, this layout is the <br />most likely outcome based on the market. <br />Chairperson VanScoy stated that if the Commission were to say they would prefer commercial <br />and there is a developer in the future that would like to create R-2, would there then be an issue <br />that could not be resolved. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that this is a sketch plan and therefore the <br />Council will use this input as feedback. He stated that this would not provide a zoning or site plan <br />approval. He noted that further review would be done if this moves forward in formal application. <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if Suite Living would be located in B-2 or R-3. <br />Mr. Roessler stated that Suite Living would be R-3 and commercial would be B-2, while the R-2 <br />would most likely be townhomes. He stated that once a user or buyer is found, a more concrete <br />plan would come forward. He stated that he does have multiple residential developers interested <br />in this proposed layout. <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, to recommend that City <br />Council approve the sketch plan contingent upon compliance with Staff Review. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners VanScoy, Johnson, Anderson, <br />Gengler, Peters, and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.