My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/09/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 07/09/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:31:02 PM
Creation date
8/29/2019 2:03:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/09/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor LeTourneau stated that $7 per utility is the amount that would be needed to get the work <br />done for Ramsey. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if franchise fees would be used solely for reconstruction or all <br />road repair elements. <br />City Engineer Westby explained that franchise fees would be used for reconstruction and <br />overlays and not minor maintenance. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked for additional details on the PIR fund. <br />Finance Director Lund provided additional details on the Public Improvement Revolving fund. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that he believes $6 to be too low as that will not get the City to the <br />point it needs to be, and he does not want to build in an increase in the future. <br />Mayor LeTourneau stated that this would be a five-year program that would sunset after five <br />years and would need to be rewritten. He stated that $6 could be used and the PIR fund could be <br />used to fill the gap in years four and five. He stated that it appears that Councilmember Riley <br />would prefer using $7 to ensure that sufficient funds are collected. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that he would be flexible and would support using the PIR fund as <br />that is money that was already collected in taxes. He noted that his concern would be that would <br />be a one-time solution for a long-term problem. <br />Councilmember Heinrich stated that she would agree that the PIR funds should be used as that is <br />money that has already been collected in taxes. She also agreed that if franchise fees are going <br />to move forward, the full amount needed should be collected. She stated that regardless of <br />whether this will be $6 or $7, her concern would be the impact on lower value properties as those <br />residents that have the highest value properties will get a better deal. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that $5 is not enough and if a franchise fee is going to be done, <br />she believes that $7.25 should be the amount. She asked if people could be rebated or decreased <br />in the future. She stated that she would like to see how the budget would look with the road <br />projects as a line item in the budget, as it was done in 2013. <br />City Administrator Ulrich explained that if the road projects are included in the budget that <br />would increase the budget for that first year and that would remain at that higher base moving <br />forward. <br />Mayor LeTourneau noted that the franchise fee program would be a five-year program and a <br />review would be done after that time. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that if the road financing were put into the levy that would be an <br />increase of over eight percent and is only the road financing and would not include any <br />City Council Work Session / June 25, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.