Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning and Land Use Decisions <br />When local governments are called upon to make zoning and land use decisions with <br />respect to proposed affordable housing projects, local citizen opposition may surface. <br />Elected officials, generally speaking, seek <br />to serve the desires of their constituents <br />and will of course be listening to <br />opposition to a project as they would any <br />sort of comment on a proposal. Moreover, <br />local residents may be raising legitimate <br />concerns having nothing to do with <br />affordable housing per se or the likely <br />residents. However, local officials must <br />also be alert to the fair housing implications of their decisions. A governmental body may <br />not escape liability under the Fair Housing Act merely because its discriminatory action <br />was undertaken in response to the desires of a majority of its citizens. 18 For strategies to <br />address neighborhood NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) opposition, see the Minnesota <br />Challenge report, included in the Links/Resources box below. <br />Links/Resources: <br />• Equitable Scorecard, developed by a coalition funded by Headwaters Foundation <br />http://thealliancetc.org/wp- <br />content/uploads/2016/06/EquitableDevelopmentScorecard.pdf <br />• St. Paul's Project and Program Evaluation Tool. (Attached in Appendix) <br />• City of Seattle's Racial Equity Toolkit - <br />http://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/RSJI/RacialEquityToolkit_FINAL_A <br />ugust2012.pdf <br />• The MN Challenge to Lower the Cost of Affordable Housing Best Practices: Achieving a Full <br />Range of Housing Choices <br />18 Mhany Mgt. v. County of Nassau, 819 F 3d 581 (2"d Cir. 2016). <br />28 <br />