My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/10/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 09/10/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:33:33 PM
Creation date
9/11/2019 4:04:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/10/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
834
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Heinrich asked why the ordinance would not die at this time. <br />Mayor LeTourneau stated that it is his assumption that the action before the Council tonight was <br />to call for a public hearing to introduce the ordinance and not to vote on the ordinance. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that any ordinance requires two readings. He stated that the <br />item on the agenda tonight has failed but the item could still appear on a future Council meeting <br />agenda. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that he is disappointed in his colleagues tonight for letting this <br />lapse. He stated that the Council is elected to do a job, and this is not doing the job. He noted <br />that there are many comments about the poor condition of roads and this action tonight was <br />simply to call for a public hearing and the Council could not even pass that. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that he could not remember a case in six years where people from <br />the public were not allowed to speak, until tonight. <br />Mayor LeTourneau stated that this is one of the most significant activities that the Council has <br />undertaken in its career and the Council needs to sensitive to the process. He echoed the <br />comments that the Council is not able to move forward on this topic. He stated that this is a <br />challenging moment. He stated that they are committed to the issue of roads and challenged by <br />the cost to maintain the asset. He hoped that the Council could come to a point tonight where the <br />discussion could be continued to a public hearing. He stated that not fixing the roads is not an <br />option. <br />7.03: Adopt Resolution #19-198 Denying a Massage Therapy License <br />Police Chief Katers reviewed the staff report and stated that after completion of the required <br />background check, he recommends denial of the licenses for Therapeutic Massage Establishment <br />for "The Gateway Massage" to be located at 14037 St. Francis Boulevard NW and denial of the <br />license for Therapeutic Massage Therapist for the applicant, Qu Xiaoxin. The basis for the <br />denial recommendation is the missing or incomplete information provided in the application(s). <br />In addition, the applicant failed to disclose involvement in other massage businesses in other <br />cities. <br />Don Cho, attorney representing the applicant, asked if the applicant should have received a letter <br />alerting them to attend the meeting. He stated that the applicant was not notified of the <br />recommended denial. <br />Police Chief Katers stated that his involvement is with the background check and a <br />recommendation based on that information. <br />Mr. Cho stated that they checked the website and found the agenda item, which is how they were <br />alerted to the possible denial of the request. <br />City Council / August 12, 2019 <br />Page 9 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.