Laserfiche WebLink
Completed feasibility analysis - <br />Completed development pro <br />- <br />Policy positions on various <br />on various outstanding pre <br /> <br />Key Outcomes/Metrics <br /> <br />development items.development items. <br /> <br />forma. <br /> <br />-and/or <br />$5,000 <br />g, or speeding <br />very preliminary. <br />from third party . Staff anticipates various <br />University of Minnesota Resilient Communities <br />. Potentially, the <br />-- <br /> <br />forma assistance/ review from Ehlers <br /> <br />Staff would like to get quotes for EDA review <br />,000 <br /> <br />,000. <br /> <br /> <br />Additional Resources & Tools Required <br />$35 <br /> <br />,000 <br /> <br />Program may play a role in completin <br />Feasibility Reports/ Concept Studies: <br />$15,000 <br />$25 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />,000 <br />$15,000 <br />$25 <br /> <br /> <br />$40,000 <br />- <br />re <br />This work will require assistance <br />$10,000 <br />-he numbers outlined above a <br /> <br />$75 <br />- <br />be utilized <br />$5,000 <br />,000 <br />$5,000 <br />- <br />-- <br />$25,000- <br />water <br />$30 <br />$15,000 <br /> <br />-- <br />review by other boards <br /> <br /> <br />up, some of this work. <br />-- <br /> <br />community center <br />- <br />-- <br />ut & fill analysis <br />$5,000 <br /> <br /> <br />(s) <br /> <br />to <br />- <br />funding sources <br />rastructurenal storm-- <br />parking ramp <br />parks/ trails <br /> <br />professionals. <br />-- <br /> <br />,000. <br />n <br />sign pla <br />regio <br />- <br />$20 <br />pro <br />nf <br />ic <br /> <br /> T <br /> <br /> <br />Timeline <br /> <br />2018 <br />COR, and our various COR development related discussions rom a development perspective, the list of City obligations (expenditures) for The COR is relatively nformally all anticipated <br /> expenses his discussion will require the City <br />discussion also warrants the City <br />defined. Additionally, development items to provide a clear scope of future <br />strategize marketing efforts, and carry out budget/ policy <br />how the City manages thisthe list of revenue streams from The COR is relatively <br />items (i.e. expenses) and how they will <br />developer for The COR. Currently, the City manages The <br />position to analyze/ respond to development proposals, <br />development costs (i.e. cut/ fill, roads, storm water, <br /> <br />to complete a feasibility analysis for all outstanding <br />and Policy <br />roughly when various improvements will be made <br />Completion of this tactic will put the City in a stronger <br /> <br />be paid for (all city, all developer, split, etc.), and <br />in several instances. Staff would like to develop a <br />the role of master Staff would like to develop more clarity/ <br /> <br />outstanding <br />with policy based on <br /> <br />straight forward, but have been committed i <br />ated revenues for the project. <br /> <br />, <br />Forma <br /> <br />, in phases, etc.). <br /> <br />to take policy positions on various <br />- <br />Pro <br /> <br />- <br />etc.). <br />long, and at this point not well <br />forma that outlines <br /> <br /> <br />Feasibility, <br /> <br />on <br />on <br /> <br /> <br />community center, signs, <br />policy/ structure <br />The City of Ramsey has taken <br />his <br />Feasibility Analysis: t <br />basis <br />(now, in the future <br /> <br />COR Development <br />Policy Positions: t <br /> <br />/ Description <br />- <br />case <br /> <br />and all anticip <br />development <br />Forma: f <br />- <br />- <br />pro <br />by <br /> <br />discussions. <br />intentional <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />formal <br /> <br />practice. <br />. <br />- <br />project <br />Pro <br />Tactics <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />(A) <br />(B) <br />(C) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />