My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/24/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 09/24/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:33:55 PM
Creation date
10/10/2019 9:30:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/24/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
664
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Attorney Langel explained that statement applies to the open forum portion of the meeting. <br />He noted that the comment is inconsistent with the remainder of the language in that section. He <br />stated that each City allows residents to comment in open forum for things not on the agenda. <br />He stated that there is no regulation on the comments related to items on the agenda and that is <br />an issue the City Council would have to discuss and resolve. He noted that this is an area of the <br />Charter that could use clarification. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that it would not make sense to preclude people from making <br />comments on the cases that are being discussed as that voids the purpose of having an open <br />meeting. <br />City Attorney Langel stated that he has seen instances where Councils have allowed or <br />disallowed public comments, depending on the agenda item. <br />City Administrator Ulrich asked for information related to time limits for public comments. <br />City Attorney Langel stated that almost every city has a three to five-minute limitation on public <br />comment and a request not to duplicate previously provided comments as a method of efficiency. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that if the City has to develop its own rule, he would propose that <br />citizens in the audience that would like to address the Council on an agenda item would be <br />allowed to speak. He noted that if the Charter needs to be amended to incorporate that statement, <br />he would suggest that be made. <br />Councilmember Heinrich asked if the comment card currently specifies that a resident cannot <br />speak at open forum on an item related to a regular agenda item. That was confirmed. She <br />requested that those cards be pulled to remove that language, as she believes it conflicts with the <br />Charter. <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked if a recommendation made to the Charter Commission to amend <br />the Charter would need to come back before the Council and require a 7-0 vote. <br />City Attorney Langel stated that he would need to review the Charter language. He stated that <br />currently the two groups are working together to cleanup language in the Charter. He noted that <br />this may be an instance that requires unanimous approval. <br />Councilmember Menth stated that it does not appear that any decision has been made to pull <br />cards and change language as additional discussion will be needed. <br />Mayor LeTourneau agreed that this item should come forward at a future worksession for further <br />discussion. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that he was unsure why much more discussion would be needed to <br />allow residents to provide public input at meetings. He stated that if the direction is going to be <br />to follow the Charter and only allow discussion during open forum, then the comment card <br />City Council Work Session / September 10, 2019 <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.