Laserfiche WebLink
developer had obtained extensions on both fronts. The current proposal has some slight changes <br />from what was previously approved and thus, the applicant is going through the review process <br />for Site Plan. He recommended that the Board approve the proposed Landscape Plan, contingent <br />upon compliance with the Staff Review Letter. <br />Board Member Hiatt asked if there would be security fencing. <br />City Planner Anderson replied that although the previously approved plan had fencing, this <br />applicant is not proposing any as access cannot be gained to any of the storage units unless you <br />are inside the building. He stated that there is a fire lane around the building for emergency <br />purposes but that will be posted as not for public use. <br />Motion by Board Member Hiatt and seconded by Board Member Covart to recommend approval <br />of the proposed Landscape Plan, contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review Letter. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Valentine, Board Member Hiatt, Covart, Bernard, and <br />Fetterley. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Madison and Moore. <br />5.03: Consider Landscape Plan Associated with the Site Plan for Name Brand Storage <br />(Project No. 19-120); Case of Josh Peterson <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the City has received an <br />application from Josh Peterson for a Minor Plat and Site Plan for a proposed self -storage facility <br />located near the western boundary of the City, north of 156th Avenue south/southwest of BNSF <br />railroad tracks. He recommended that the Board recommend approval of the proposed Landscape <br />Plan, contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review Letter. <br />Board Member Hiatt asked if there is an intention to expand the cul-de-sac. <br />City Planner Anderson explained that the intention will be to eventually make the connection to <br />Alpine Drive as part of the Highway 10 access management plan. <br />Chairperson Valentine stated that it could be helpful for the Board to review the Highway 10 <br />options that were recently reviewed at an open house, as that could help provide context for future <br />planning cases that will be reviewed in that area. <br />City Planner Anderson confirmed that he would attempt to add that item to the July or August <br />meeting. <br />City Councilmember Musgrove believed that there are upcoming meetings that will narrow down <br />the choices as well. <br />City Planner Anderson noted that he can provide updates as future meetings occur. He advised <br />that interested members of the Board are welcome to attend the meetings as well. <br />Motion by Board Member Covart and seconded by Board Member Fetterley to recommend <br />approval of the proposed Landscape Plan, contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review <br />Letter. <br />Environmental Policy Board / June 17, 2019 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />