Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Riley stated that currently the proposed budget is an increase of 6.77 percent, <br /> and prior year funds are being used to buy it down to that amount. He stated that while he <br /> approves of the buying down, he would like to see the rate closer to six percent. He stated that it <br /> was said earlier that $91,000 would need to be cut to reach six percent. He noted that with the <br /> surplus funds exceeding $400,000 and $600,000 in the past two years, he would think it realistic <br /> that an additional $91,000 could be cut from the budget without impacting bond ratings. <br /> Mayor LeTourneau asked for additional information on the surplus piece, as it was determined <br /> that the surplus is composed of different forms of revenue. He asked if the desire would be to <br /> estimate projected building permit revenue further. <br /> Councilmember Riley stated that he has not done the analysis to determine where the large <br /> surplus amounts are coming from. He stated that if that is coming from building permit revenue, <br /> then perhaps that item be adjusted. <br /> Mayor LeTourneau stated that the budget is balanced based on revenue against expenses. He <br /> stated that the larger savings would be on the expense side. <br /> Councilmember Riley stated that he would like to see the levy reduced. <br /> City Administrator Ulrich stated that in order to reduce the levy they would make more <br /> aggressive revenue projections. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove stated that the City would not want to over project revenues. She <br /> stated that it can appear good on paper but that might not be a real project of revenue and <br /> expenses. <br /> Mayor LeTourneau stated that currently the City uses a conservative approach to projecting <br /> revenue and some commented that a more aggressive approach would be better. He stated that it <br /> appears now that the statement is being made that over projecting revenues would not look good <br /> on paper. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove stated that she would not want to just say there will more revenue just <br /> to make the expenses look less. She stated that she would like to see both revenues and expenses <br /> accurately projected. She referenced the Happy Days budget of $12,000, noting that the <br /> projected revenue is $15,000. She asked how the additional revenue from the event is then <br /> allocated. <br /> Finance Director Lund explained that the City contributes $12,000 to the Happy Days account <br /> and the organization receives contributions from businesses and sponsors. She stated that Happy <br /> Days is a standalone fund and the contribution from the City and any other contributions that the <br /> organization receives, stay with that organization. <br /> City Council Special Work Session/September 3, 2019 <br /> Page 9 of 17 <br />