Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Gladhill commented that there is not a Council liaison on the <br />Planning Commission. He noted that there are two members of the Council on the Economic <br />Development Authority, which reviews deal structures. <br />Councilmember Riley noted that he is a member of the EDA and advised that the group reviewed <br />this as a high-level concept and the consensus was to direct staff to continue to pursue the project <br />with no preference between the two sites. He stated that he is also excited that there is another <br />retail component potentially located adjacent to this hotel. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that similar comments were made from the <br />Planning Commission, although the Commission deferred to the EDA as they viewed it as more <br />of a real estate management aspect. He noted that the Planning Commission was supportive of <br />both options. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that there has been a push for more restaurants in the community <br />and this hotel would have a restaurant and would be a good addition to the community. <br />Mayor LeTourneau noted that Councilmember Kuzma also serves on the EDA and that is where <br />his input came from. <br />Councilmember Menth recognized that there are no drawings but asked if there would be an idea <br />on the number of stories or rooms. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill commented that this would be a four-story building <br />with 60 guest suites with a footprint just under 10,000 square feet. <br />Councilmember Heinrich asked if staff can elaborate on the developer of the other proposed <br />hotel project, as it was her understanding that the developer is no longer under contract with the <br />landowner and therefore the deal has gone cold. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that it is the understanding of staff that the <br />original timeline has expired, and the property may not be under contract any longer. He stated <br />that it would be likely that only one hotel would move forward and it appears that this project <br />may be more promising at this time. He noted that the other project was pursuing grant funds <br />that were not awarded. He stated that staff is not spending additional time on the previous <br />project unless additional requests are brought forward. <br />Councilmember Heinrich stated that it seems that this hotel would be more promising being <br />closer to Highway 10. <br />Motion by Councilmember Riley, seconded by Councilmember Kuzma, to confirm consensus of <br />the Planning Commission and EDA that the City is generally supportive of both site concepts for <br />further evaluation. <br />City Council / September 24, 2019 <br />Page 9 of 14 <br />