Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor LeTourneau asked if there have been other financing options in the past. <br />City Administrator Ulrich confirmed that these have been the only payment options. He noted <br />that some cities have chosen to extend the financing term but noted that would also increase the <br />amount of interest over that period. <br />Ms. Kruger noted that the residents planned for $3,900 and would like additional time to come <br />up with the remaining assessment payment in order to avoid interest. <br />Mayor LeTourneau asked staff for additional information on how the preliminary assessment <br />amount is communicated with residents. <br />City Engineer Westby explained that when the preliminary assessment amount is adopted a <br />statement is made that the amount is preliminary, and the amount can change due to actual <br />construction costs. He confirmed that those elements are typically out of the control of the City. <br />Councilmember Heinrich asked if the City has ever reduced the interest rate for residents or <br />extended an interest free timeframe to pay an assessment. <br />City Engineer Westby explained that the City has not varied from the interest rate offered. He <br />stated that the Finance Director prefers to keep the rate for construction project assessments at <br />ten years and noted that has remained consistent for the past five years of the program. <br />Councilmember Heinrich asked if an extended repayment period would be desirable. <br />City Engineer Westby explained that if the term is extended, the residents would pay more <br />because interest would be charged throughout that extended term. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that the Council spent a long time discussing this case prior to <br />tonight. He noted that a larger assessment of $6,600 was originally discussed and that amount <br />was decreased to the assessment proposed tonight. He noted that residents could pay the $3,900 <br />prior to the November deadline to minimize the amount that would carry forward and that would <br />be charged interest. <br />City Engineer Westby commented that it is his understanding that residents can either pay the <br />full amount or let the total assessment go onto the taxes. He noted that residents could still <br />continue to save in order to pay off the amount early. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that staff could look into the option to possibly payoff a portion <br />of the assessment upfront and let the remainder go onto the taxes. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that past assessments have followed the 25 percent assessment <br />rule and there was robust discussion on this case. He stated that he was overruled, and the <br />decision was made to lower the assessment to the proposed amount. <br />City Council / October 8, 2019 <br />Page 5 of 15 <br />