My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/22/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/22/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:35:03 PM
Creation date
10/17/2019 4:55:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
10/22/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the City is obligated to ensure proper erosion control during construction or in the event of a project default. The <br />surety also allows the City to clean up nuisances created by an uncompleted, defaulted project. <br />Based on administration of several recent projects, Staff recommends that the surety amount be reduced to 25% of <br />the Engineer's Estimate and held through a 1-Year Warranty Period after final completion. The warranty is already <br />a requirement of any project. A majority of Developers do not object to the current obligation, but do note that <br />other local municipalities have a lower rate. Staff does recommend that a surety should continue to be required, but <br />is supportive of a lower amount. <br />PERMIT FEES <br />The structure of collection of Building Permit Fees is required by the Minnesota State Building Code. For the most <br />part, fees must be based on the value of the project. There are a few exceptions that allow flat rate fees. In the past, <br />the Department of Labor of Industry, who administers the State Building Code, has expressed concern that Ramsey <br />has too many flat rate fees and should be doing more based on valuation. <br />The amount collected based on this structure is up to the local municipality. Over the past 3 years, the City has been <br />reducing Building Permit Rates (on average approximately 10%). At the same time, the City has been adding <br />needed resources to keep up with work demand. With recent technology enhancements, the City has right -sized our <br />permit fees. Our fees appear to be within the median range of peer communities. <br />DEVELOPER FEEDBACK <br />Staff has reached out to a few Developers with experience in other communities for specific feedback on our <br />general rates and charges. <br />Developer A - Medium Density Residential Developer <br />I see City of Ramsey Development Fees to be about $9,000 per lot. That is right in the middle of what we see. Peer <br />Community A (Developed Community) is less than half. Peer Community B (Nearby Developing Community) is <br />almost double. <br />In my opinion, I don't have too much concern about the amount of the City Fee under the following circumstances: <br />• The fees are easy to find <br />• The fees don't change while we are under contract for the land <br />• The fees don't go up dramatically from year to year <br />• There is a clear nexus from the fees paid to the services delivered <br />Developer B - Single Family Residential Builder (Local/Regional) <br />The Park and Trail Fee (combined) is the highest of all the neighborhoods we develop (metro edge communities) at <br />approximately $5,000. Ostego reduced their Park Fee significantly from $4,057 per unit to $1,986 per unit. <br />Developer C - Single -Family Residential Builder (National) - Captured from University of Minnesota Ramsey RCP <br />Partnership <br />The City of Ramsey does have competitive fees when compared to other cities where we develop, which spread <br />across the Twin Cities Metro. Two of those cities that are closest to Ramsey are Anoka and Otsego. Anoka is <br />largely developed with few opportunities for large tracts of undeveloped land. Because of this, the land that is being <br />developed is closer to established infrastructure and utilities, lowering the cost of trunk fees, staff processing costs, <br />etc. Ramsey, on the other hand, does have more undeveloped land further outside the city center. As a result, <br />Ramsey and Otsego's general trunk and application fees are higher to support the long-term maintenance to the new <br />infrastructure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.