Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session 5.14. <br />Meeting Date: 11/12/2019 <br />Submitted For: Grant Riemer, Engineering/Public Works <br />By: Mary.lo Warner, Engineering/Public Works <br />Information <br />Title <br />Report from Public Works Committee. <br />The Public Works Committee held its regular meeting on October 15, 2019 and discussed the following cases: <br />1. Correction Regarding Water Efficiency Grant Program: Consensus of the Committee that the City should <br />continue with its application to the Metropolitan Council for the Water Efficiency Program. The Committee <br />consensus was that the City should continue with its grant application to the Metropolitan Council for the Water <br />Efficiency Program, and that there is no need for Staff to bring this information back to a regular Council meeting <br />at this time, but instead simply provide an email update to the other members of the City Council, with the <br />understanding that the full Council will need to accept the grant if awarded. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />1. Correction Regarding Water Efficiency Grant Program: City Engineer Westby stated that on September 24, <br />2019, the Ramsey City Council approved submitting an application to the Metropolitan Council by September 30 <br />for a grant up to $50,000 to help the City conserve water by lowering the cost for residents to purchase and install <br />products that reduce water use including toilets, irrigation sprinklers and controllers, and to perform irrigation <br />system audits. During the City Council meeting, Councilmember Kuzma asked staff if this grant program would be <br />open to all residents, regardless if they were served by City water or a private well. City Engineer Westby <br />responded that the program would be open to all residents. Since such time, staff has learned that only property <br />owners using municipal water would be eligible for the program. During the Council meeting, Councilmember <br />Musgrove asked staff what the City's maximum cost share would be. City Engineer Westby responded that the <br />City's maximum cost share would be $12,500, which is 25 percent of $50,000. However, the City's maximum cost <br />share would actually be $16,666.67, which is 33.3 percent of $50,000. Staff applied for the grant funding before the <br />end of September as required. However, staff is now seeking input from the Committee as to whether the City <br />Council may have voted differently on September 24 th upon knowing that the program is only open to municipal <br />water users and that the maximum share for the City would be $16,666.67 instead of $12,500. Motion for City <br />Council to ratify the consensus of the Committee that the City should continue with its application to the <br />Metropolitan Council for the Water Efficiency Program. The Committee consensus was that the City should <br />continue with its grant application to the Metropolitan Council for the Water Efficiency Program, and that there is <br />no need for Staff to bring this information back to a regular Council meeting at this time, but instead simply <br />provide an email update to the other members of the City Council, with the understanding that the full Council will <br />need to accept the grant if awarded. <br />Recommendation: <br />1. Motion for City Council to ratify the Consensus of the Committee that the City should continue with its grant <br />application to the Metropolitan Council for the Water Efficiency Program, and that there is no need for Staff to <br />bring this information back to a regular Council meeting at this time, but instead simply provide an email update to <br />the other members of the City Council, with the understanding that the full Council will need to accept the grant if <br />awarded. <br />Action: <br />