My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/12/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 11/12/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:35:14 PM
Creation date
11/14/2019 4:40:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/12/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Gladhill explained that the fees are per unit, not based on lot <br />size. He stated that the fees are determined based on the different City CIPs. <br />Councilmember Musgrove believed that the stormwater fee should increase to ensure that the <br />City costs are covered. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that will come back to the Council in <br />November for review. <br />Councilmember Riley asked the difference between the stormwater management and stormwater <br />utility fees. <br />Finance Director Lund explained the difference between the two, noting that stormwater <br />management funds new projects while stormwater utility funds maintenance activities. <br />Councilmember Heinrich referenced the park dedication comparatives and noted that it appears <br />Ramsey is on the median to high range and asked if that could be reduced. She stated that it <br />seems that is where Ramsey is coming in high. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood confirmed that staff could look <br />into that although he was unsure what the manner of that would be because of the different <br />variables. He explained that the park and trail dedication fees are based off the City's Park CIP. <br />He explained that there is a huge gap in revenue projections. He stated that while neighboring <br />communities may have a lesser park dedication rate, their projected park system does not have <br />the same want or need. He stated that some of the other communities mentioned are funding <br />parks and trails through other methods, such as municipal liquor store proceeds. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that he would not want the Ramsey numbers to be out of line. He <br />asked if staff has heard that Ramsey is not getting development because of its fees. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill commented that there is a significant amount of <br />development in Ramsey, that is actually taxing staff to process the applications. He noted that <br />there has been an immense amount of growth. <br />Councilmember Riley noted that the City received some strong feedback a few years ago from <br />Dennis Sharp and asked if those comments were incorporated into the City fees. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that feedback was used to provide <br />additional balance when the fees were revamped in 2016. He reviewed some of the <br />improvements and tweaks that were made throughout the past ten years to reduce the City fees. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that he has not received complaints about the fees but more the <br />time it takes to process permits. He stated that he would not be in favor of spending time <br />reducing fees and would be more interested in further streamlining the process. <br />City Council Work Session / October 22, 2019 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.