My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/05/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2019
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/05/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 2:59:59 PM
Creation date
11/21/2019 9:47:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/05/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, to close the public <br /> hearing. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Anderson, Johnson, Gengler, <br /> Peters, VanScoy, and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 7:16 p.m. <br /> Commission Business <br /> Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Peters, to adopt Resolution <br /> #19-210 granting a variance to the location requirements for a detached accessory structure on <br /> the subject property. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Anderson, Peters, Gengler, <br /> Johnson, VanScoy, and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> 6. COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> 6.01: Consider Site Selection Options for New Hotel Concept <br /> Presentation <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill presented the Staff Report and noted that staff <br /> believes that this is a worthy project for this parcel and is generally comfortable with either <br /> alternative site selection. The intent for this evening is high-level; does the Planning <br /> Commission desire this project to get to the finish line? If so, staff will chart out the necessary <br /> approval process moving forward. <br /> Commission Business <br /> Chairperson Bauer asked if the EDA has reviewed this concept. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill replied that the EDA would be reviewing this <br /> concept at their meeting the following week. He noted that the Planning Commission provides <br /> more input on design and layout while the EDA tends to focus more on the deal structure. <br /> Chairperson Bauer stated that both options appear that they could work but noted that it would be <br /> helpful to know which parcel would be better for current development and which parcel would <br /> be better kept for future development. <br /> Commissioner Woestehoff asked if Lot 1 is vacant or whether that is Stone Brook Academy. It <br /> was confirmed that Lot 1 is Stone Brook Academy. <br /> Planning Commission/ September 5, 2019 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.