My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/07/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/07/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:37:08 AM
Creation date
4/1/2005 2:34:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/07/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.:; . ~ ', :,.; ~ . . <br />Mr. Paul Schmaltz, 16554 Quar~.~ stated t~r¢ ls.:gothmg for the new east/west connection of the <br />City. He stated this is the mis~i[ng pi~c0:t0!th~ p~zle. They are rushing into this without <br />examining the roadway postt~oamg tmit~e::~t~. He mdmated he would hke to see more <br />consideration given to Comprehe~iye Pl~[~e~ments. <br /> <br />Mr. Bud Augst wondered what th~ time ~m~wa~ from previous zoning was. <br /> <br />Commum~ Development Dlree~ Tm~g~n, s~!ed there were no zomng changes done to this <br />parcel of land. He stated they pedbdicali~ ~at, ~e zodng maps to reflect changes. <br /> <br />Mr. Augst stated it must have ~,n sme s~dy to?hinge the Zo~g seven months ago. <br /> <br />Communi, Development DkeCibr T~e~n djsa~eed that the zOning was changed seven <br />months ago. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated w~tt :they ~ete !{ohng at was the result of when they were <br />reviewing the Comprehensive :' ~ ' .... ' <br />P~n;:some~ ~ ~were questionable so the map was redone to <br />co:ect mistakes. He stated the c~nge i~;J~l~ inVOlved a small number of prope~ies in the Ci~. <br />Mr. Fred Lemkau, 695[ 167th ~*nue, ~mie~ reek need to look at a road map before approving <br />the sketch plan. He stated 167th ~11 n°tkc~°~ffi~date added traffic· <br /> <br />~r. Tony [e~, t6685 Oamea, s~¢d:hiS'~&~m is the qmli~ of life in ~ams~y. m stated they <br />moved here t~ee years ago b~a~se o~e-Open: a ea in the Ci~. He thought the Ci~ should <br />consider allowing only one unit <br /> <br />Mr. Joe Smith, 16821 Garner S~re~t,:s~ w~n the site plan is looked at, there should be <br />consideration for transifio~ng be~ame.:;~e~ly::~ere is none. He stated he lives ve, close to a <br />cul2de-sac and if they Open ~s;hP,: the ~ah ~mc will go to Us road. He stated that as a <br />registered voter in the Ci, of RmseY, :h{ °~pO~d the amendmem of the Comprehensive Plan <br />and the Brookfield Addition. <br /> <br />Ms. Panic Lewere~, 7009 175 :~venUe N~, ,{~ted ~ese developments need to be looked at <br />closer. She thought ~t w~ uncall~ for ~:~Se~er up to these developments when people south <br />of there will not have a:untfl the~eH. Shq ~ke~ why the lots needed to be so small. She stated <br />there are a lot of things that ne~ to Be {ooked~ at that have not been looked at before· She <br />thought they needed to look at th~ entir~C~{aff~not just the one developmem. She thought the <br />development was too small in lots~and the ~o~s ~eded to be looked at. <br /> <br />~: ~icha~l :llis, 17001 166~:avenu~ ~, ~hted he h~ a n~mber of p~oblems with thi~ <br />development. One is the transit~n ~hOo~; t~re is also a tramc factor. He did not feel the <br />neighborhood could handle thet~ffie. H~ S~te~ ~e Schools are already over crowded and they <br />need a high school. He recommended ;t~a~ ~e~ Commission not approve the Amendment or <br />Sketch Plan. <br /> <br /> Pla~mng Co~m~imn~areh 3, 2005 <br /> <br />P13 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.