Laserfiche WebLink
indmted he agrees there is nothing spe h at3 t the court houses. t ted me ,ow home do <br />not show th~s well on the plan, b~ they~qa~0~ a m,ddle ~een space. He ,nd,cated the court <br />homes are a back to back prodder OO~a~e~o~{ducing in Apple Valley. He noted he would <br />provide architectural designs on ~ pioffuC~:~ ~y move fo~ard. <br /> ~ ~ ~ _.~ <br />Chai,erson Nixt stated he seeS;~'ofl~e:'~ing issue coming from the cou~ homes. He <br />indicated he would reallY welco~ o~ei-e~3~p$~ ~deas besides the cou~ homes. <br />Commissioner Brauer indicated ~e ap~efi~ ~e something they need and w~ch needs to be <br />paff of the Tom Center. He s~d th~;~W~ho~es, if they look like what is on 116, would be <br />good. He indicated what t~oWs~id Bff;i~ ~e 8~gle,fmily in the middle. He stated he would <br />work on an ~ncrease of dens,~ ~,~ ~he mid~e~t~would prowde more green space and he would <br />break up the ba~acks 10ok of ~ ~om hb&~;: ~d off-set with a lower densi, in the no~hwest <br /> where <br />corner <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated if <br /> you: look ~t~e ~ouses next to t~s development, some of the <br />single-brady homes would have ~ve h0m4s m ~,r back yard, whmh ,s too much. He indicated <br />there is too much densi, in the o hw%f ebm . He stated if the applicant compromises and <br />leaves the street as ,t ,s, at least one slde:bv{I~:ot~er developmem needs to be lower dens,~. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Sc°y indiei~d~ he"~°~a ¢~econd the concerns about the densi, in the <br />no~hwest corner and at the R-1 ~ea~.: m Mic d that as a general concept plan he thins this <br />fits well, and is how he envisioned deVe~0Ph~t':t~ continue on from the Town Center. <br /> <br />Commissioner Watson noted iti~gie~ <br /> to s~e~pl~ that fits well wit~n the Comprehensive Plan. <br />He stated his assessment is the ,~me ~:t~e~ Commissioners in that theY need to see more <br />densi~ in the center ofmthe deve~pme~:~d~le~in the noahwest comer. He noted it would be <br />in the best interest of Pulte Home tO ~ t6 the no~hwest comer for relationship with the <br />neighboring development. <br /> <br />Mr. Leper noted that he beheves~e:P!~ng C~m~ssmn ~s telhng ~m the apartment is a good <br />~dea, and the row home ~s okay, ~t th~c~ home needs some massaging. He stated it sounds <br />like the single-family small lot ~ wh~f~Y; Wilj have trouble using, and going from the court <br />homes to large lot units will be ~issUe. i. ~: ~3 ' <br /> <br />Chaicerson Nixt noted there ar{'~a ii~le dv&t~t00 u~ts in the no~hwest comer. He suggested <br />Pulte Homes work w~th Staff to ~ghZe a~P~;~ promde more green space. He stated the C~ <br />has used detached tow~omes p~iOUsly, ~d ~t may work well. He indicated he ~s not asking <br />the applicant to redesign their ~odUcB bgt~at~r to fi~re out how to put the produCt on an <br />appropriate-- -:~ lot. <br /> <br /> logk~ a[ th~ existing plat, it seems the row homes are a <br />Commissioner Brauer stated if~oU <br />transition device. He indicated ~at on t~e~P!a~}they fora a nice transition from the apa~ment <br />building, and even to the cou~ he, es a~d!sifigle~famfly ~n the middle. He stated if the apphcant <br />could readjust and have row ho~s tta~i~i0~n~to single-family in the no~hwest comer it may <br /> <br />P27 <br /> <br /> <br />