Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission 6. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 01/02/2020 <br />By: Chloe McGuire Brigl, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />PUBLIC HEARING: Consider Request for a Zoning Amendment for Two Parcels at 9340 Highway 10 NW <br />(Project No. 19-151); Case of MYWC, LLC <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider a zoning amendment request from MYWC, LLC (the "Applicant") to rezone <br />two (2) properties from B-1 Business District to R-1 Single Family Detached Homes (MUSA). The properties were <br />rezoned in the 1990s from Residential to Business and guided in the Comprehensive Plan as Mixed Use (which <br />includes both business and residential uses). The eastern property includes a residential home that appears to have <br />been built in the 1970s under a previous residential zoning district, and the western property is vacant. Since the <br />home was built as a residential structure under a residential zoning district at the time, the use was provided lawful, <br />non -conforming protections at the time of the 1990s Zoning Amendment. The property with the existing home is up <br />for sale and via a request for a zoning verification letter, Staff found a potential issue with lawful non -conforming <br />status as the Owner previously used the property exclusively for commercial (office) use. <br />Notification: <br />Notifications of this proposal were sent via Standard US Mail to Property Owners within 350 feet of the Subject <br />Property, as reflected by Anoka County Property Records. A notice was also published in the Anoka Union Herald, <br />the City's Official newspaper. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Summary <br />There are two properties owned by the Applicant; 9340 Highway 10 NW, which has an existing home, and the <br />adjacent parcel to the west, which is currently vacant. The property with the home is up for sale and through the <br />sales process, Staff became aware of the potential issue with lawful, nonconforming status. In working with the City <br />Attorney, it does not appear that the residential use is lawful, nonconforming based on the most recent uses of the <br />property. There was a gap of more than 12 months without a residential use, thereby abandoning the lawful, <br />nonconforming protection under Minnesota Statutes. <br />Evaluating existing conditions of the property and surrounding area, Staff does believe a residential zoning district <br />is most appropriate. Staff recommends a zoning amendment to R-1 Residential to allow the residential use 'by right' <br />and to remove any issues with lawful, nonconforming uses. The Owner agrees with this approach and has applied <br />for this Zoning Amendment. <br />Previous Uses <br />The best information Staff has been able to find shows that the home was used in the following ways: <br />From original construction until 2009 100% residential <br />2010 - 2015 100% office <br />2015 - 2019 Mix of office and residential <br />