Laserfiche WebLink
City of Ramsey <br />Department of Economic Development <br />Ramsey, MN 55303 <br />RE: Proposed Plat by DC Ramsey LLC Townhomes <br />Dear Planning Commission, <br />We have reviewed the sketch plat and plan for the above titled development. While we support <br />development of the property, it must be done appropriately. We have the following comments <br />regarding the proposed plat: <br />1. The boundary transition plan for the adjacent R-1 zoned property north of the proposed lots 8 <br />thru 14: <br />• The proposed plat does not include a transition plan for the adjacent R-1 zoned <br />properties. <br />• In "Review of Sketch Plan for DC Ramsey, LLC Townhomes" (Plat) it is acknowledged that <br />the underlying zoning of the adjacent north properties are R-1 but tries to utilize the <br />justification that the use is commercial as to why the transition plans are not required. <br />While the use may be commercial, the underlying R-1 zoning is still controlling. <br />Furthermore, there is no commercial zoning listed on the official zoning map; it is only <br />Business Districts (B-1, B-2, or H-1) zoning. Therefore, a transition plan would be <br />required by the City of Ramsey Zoning Ordinance (Zoning) Chapter 117-110(a). <br />• Considering Chapter 117-110(e).2 for a PUD, the landscape requirement should be <br />determined by correlating the overall density to either R-1, R-2, or R-3. Since the <br />underlying zoning is R-1 it is reasonable to use that correlation and require landscaping <br />to meet Level 4 requirements. This requirement should be implemented for lots 8-14. <br />• The Plat indicated that the border between the proposed development is mostly <br />wetland. Only lots 1-7 and Outlot B are buffered by the wetland. We agree that no <br />transition plan is needed for the wetland area. However, lots 8-14 have little to no <br />wetland buffer to the adjacent property therefore the reasoning that a transition plan is <br />not needed does not reflect the reality of the property. <br />• In addition, Chapter 117-112(e).7. should be implemented for this development. This <br />would require a minimum of 30 feet of buffer and a 10% increase in number of <br />plantings. <br />• The Plat also indicated the willingness to "trade" the transition plan for additional <br />architecture features on the front of the property. <br />"Staff would like feedback on the density transitioning requirement. Staff is <br />comfortable with the 20 feet of buffer, with some additional architectural <br />features on the homes, which could include "fronts" of homes facing the public <br />road to the south to increase visual interest and continue the trend of <br />townhomes in the COR. <br />