Laserfiche WebLink
Street Supervisor Riemer replied that 40 percent of the cost is grading and 60 percent is travel. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski reviewed the location of the remaining gravel roads. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired if there has been any concerns from the Police or Fire <br />Departments regarding the difficulty on accessing some of the dirt roads. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that he thinks it is a real concern because in Ms. Blackstad's neighborhood <br />people have to drive in other people's yards to get through. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman replied that the problem is that the Council has not instructed <br />Public Works staff to do the necessary maintenance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that in the best case scenario the paved road costs more to <br />maintain, ignoring the initial cost to build it and the reoccurring overlay costs. So the best case <br />scenario is that it is cheaper for the City to have the dirt roads, which has to be a reality because <br />in the country the County is not out there paving roads to save costs. Obviously the cost to build <br />and maintain a dirt road is less. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson replied that if cost the City $22,500 to maintain the dirt roads and <br />$20,592 for the paved roads, the maintenance cost is less on the paved roads. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski noted that the paved street costs do not include the initial construction <br />costs because but it is paid by the developer or the people who live on the street. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he did not think that the analysis was a true <br />representation of the actual costs. He stated that he would have a difficult time believing the <br />assumptions without further analysis. He noted that currently the City does not allow any dirt <br />roads to be built in the City so the dirt roads they are talking about are existing streets so there <br />would be no developers to cover the cost to pave the roads so the City would have to incur the <br />cost or the property owners. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson replied that staff was not making any recommendation as to <br />whether they should require people to pave their streets. He explained that there had been a lot <br />of comments that the people who live on dirt roads subsidize paved streets and both analysis <br />presented show that that is not the case. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that the total cost of maintaining paved streets is greater then <br />maintaining gravel streets. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson replied that he did not agree. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that the total cost of maintaining paved streets is $30.52 x 2 <br />which is $61.04 per unit, of that $30.52 comes from the City and $30.52 goes to the homeowner. <br />In the dirt road scenario it is $51.72. So in reality it is cheaper to maintain the dirt road, but the <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/May 21, 2002 <br /> Page 6 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />