My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 07/16/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 07/16/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:31:12 AM
Creation date
5/12/2003 2:15:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
07/16/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Hendriksen stated they would do a project that costs $320,000 and collect <br />$56,000. They would be taking about a quarter ora million dollars out of these funds. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson responded the report states the current residents would generate <br />$80,456 if they decide to hook up. If each of the eight groups with three lots split into two lots, <br />16 hook ups would generate about $160,912. That is not the full potential in that development, <br />each one could subdivide up to three times. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated they would still be $90,000 short of getting their money back. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson explained sewer and water together is just over $100,000. <br /> <br />Chairperson Zimmerman stated he agrees if they were to take $200,000 off each subdivision it <br />will not be long before a Council says everyone has to hook up and the promises they gave to the <br />people will mean nothing. He stated he needs to hear what the people want, if it is better than 50 <br />percent he will vote for it, if they do not want it he will not vote for it. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec clarified the amount was based on eight property owners rather than the amount of <br />lots. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson explained the $40,000 comes from the amount of $319,000 <br />divided by eight. They have never talked to the people about funding any portion of a storm <br />upgrade from assessments. They are paying storm drainage utility like anyone else. <br /> <br />Chairperson Zimmerman expressed concern that if this were to go through and one of the <br />property owners were to sell off one of their lots, the purchaser could refuse to pay the $40,000 to <br />the City. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson responded the residents could not subdivide without hooking up to <br />sewer and water. At the time sewer and water go through they can subdivide into three lots and <br />sell off the other lots. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated when plats pay into these various fees, specifically Riley <br />Estates, they as a Council made a decision that they would allow them to spend the amount of <br />money they contribute in sewer and water trunk fees. If it costs more than what they were <br />contributing they had to pick up the difference. Now Principal City Engineer Olson is saying <br />these residents' contribution to the storm water utility fee will be used for $250,000 in sewer and <br />trunk fees. With a fee of $25 per year, that is their contribution for roughly 1,000 years. It is <br />obvious they cannot do this in all the developments they have across the City, and people, will be <br />asking for what they do for this development. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated he sees some real benefit, but this area is very unique with their drainage <br />problems. One way or another something will have to be done in this area, whether it is storm <br />srwer, now is the time to look at it or tell the People they are stuck. It comes down to dollars. <br />He asked why the figures are determined with eight lots. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/July 16, 2002 <br /> Page 8 of 28 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.