Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION #19-281 <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DELTA <br />MODTECH <br />RECITALS <br />1. That on June 25, 2019, the City Council granted approval of Final Plat and Site Plan for <br />Delta ModTech to construct a new facility on the property generally known as 8445 Bunker <br />Lake Blvd NW and legally described as follows: <br />Lot 1, Block 1 Amsterdam Extension <br />(the "Subject Property") <br />2. That on September 16, 2019, the City received a request to consider potential revisions to <br />the approved Landscape Plan that would reduce the total number of plantings (both trees <br />and shrubs) on the Subject Property. <br />3. That concerns were raised regarding the available space for plantings to grow; future <br />detriments to certain maintenance activities; and overall aesthetics of overplanting the <br />Subject Property. <br />4. That on November 6, 2019, the City received a revised Landscape Plan for consideration. <br />5. That on November 18, 2019, the Environmental Policy Board reviewed and recommended <br />approval of the revised Landscape Plan as it would result in a healthier landscape while not <br />diminishing the appearance of the Subject Property from the public road or from the <br />adjacent residential parcel. <br />6. That the Environmental Policy Board also directed Staff to review the landscape <br />requirements for the Employment Districts and research potential amendments for <br />consideration at a future meeting. <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THIS PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE <br />CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />That the Ramsey City Council hereby grants approval of the revised Landscape Plan for Delta <br />ModTech. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />