Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Kuzma stated that when the first round of budgeting was completed direction <br />was given to reduce and Police Chief Katers replied with the three-year replacement plan. He <br />stated that he would support the three-year replacement plan as proposed. He commented that it <br />would make more sense to leave the peace officer's fund balances as is, rather than attempting to <br />use those funds to offset the operating budget. <br />2.02: 2020 Capital Equipment Requests <br />Finance Director Lund reviewed the staff report. <br />City Administrator Ulrich provided input on the distribution policy, which allocates funds to the <br />capital maintenance fund. <br />Councilmember Riley referenced a seized vehicle and asked what that would be replaced with. <br />Police Chief Katers replied that he would purchase whatever is available on the State purchasing <br />contract. He explained that there are restrictions on what a vehicle can be used for when they are <br />obtained through seizure, therefore it may not meet the needs of the department. <br />Councilmember Musgrove referenced differences between 2020 and 2021 and noted that the <br />difference seems to be based on the allocation of funds that is made through the distribution <br />policy. She asked if a larger amount of the fire truck should be purchased in 2020 because the <br />funds are available rather than having to bond in the future years. <br />Finance Director Lund explained that there are not additional funds that would be available in <br />2020 to use for the fire truck. She explained that a capital equipment certificate would be issued <br />for the total amount of debt. <br />2.03: Discuss 2020 Personnel Requests <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher reviewed the staff report. <br />Councilmember Heinrich referenced a previous worksession discussion related to the Planning <br />Technician noting that the intent was to keep that position budget neutral and asked for <br />additional details. <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher explained that the Planning Technician would have 40 <br />hours per week and the phased retirement position would have 16 hours per week. She <br />explained that is necessary to handle the current workload in that department. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill explained the difference in pay rate between the <br />employee entering phased retirement and the Planning Technician. He noted that the position <br />would most likely be offset by permit revenue. <br />Councilmember Heinrich asked if it would be possible for the Planning Technician to have less <br />than 40 hours per week. <br />City Council Work Session / November 18, 2019 <br />Page 7 of 14 <br />