Laserfiche WebLink
what would happen in the case that there are ten candidates and whether there would be enough <br />votes to elect one person. <br />Councilmember Heinrich thanked the Charter Commission and City Attorney Langel for their <br />work to cleanup this chapter of the Charter to become more consistent with State law. <br />Councilmember Riley thanked the Charter Commission, noting that it appears that the <br />Commission made good decisions that will benefit the City. He noted that the Council has not <br />been full for multiple years because of the requirements for special elections. He commented <br />that as someone that has been a part of primaries in the past, he appreciates the cost savings and <br />elimination of that requirement. <br />Councilmember Menth asked for details on appointments to the Council and the procedure that <br />would be followed. <br />City Attorney Langel stated that the Charter does not identify the nomination, noting that the <br />appointment process is not controlled by State law and is instead controlled by the Council. He <br />noted that as someone that represents multiple City Councils, there is not just one way that is <br />completed. He stated that it will be up to the City Council to determine how to complete that <br />process. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she attended Charter Commission meetings and thanked <br />the Commission for their thorough discussion and work on this topic. She commended City <br />Attorney Langel for his work in drafting the new language and asked for input on how the City <br />Clerk will interpret some of this language, specifically 4.5.1. <br />City Attorney Langel stated that the City Clerk is the Election Official for the City and the City <br />Clerk was present at all the meetings of the Charter Commission. He confirmed that it would be <br />the job of the City Clerk to interpret the language. He explained that there is not much <br />interpretation of City staff but more the decision of the City Council as to which option they <br />would proceed with when a vacancy occurs. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that while he appreciates the work of the Charter Commission and <br />City Attorney Langel, he feels that this decision is rushed and would like to see this item come <br />back to the City Council in worksession, which would allow additional time to digest the <br />information. <br />Motion by Councilmember Kuzma to table Ordinance #19-15 amending the City Charter by <br />repealing and replacing Chapter 4 — Nominations and Elections. The motion failed for lack of <br />second. <br />City Attorney Langel reminded the Council of the statutory timing, noting that the City does not <br />have much choice in the timing. He stated that within one month of the public hearing, the <br />Council must vote on the ordinance. He noted that if that timeline is not met, the ordinance <br />would die. <br />City Council / November 26, 2019 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />