Laserfiche WebLink
Table 12. Summary of level of stripping and pavement information by section <br />Location Amount of Stripping Observed HMA Design Year Paved <br />Burnsville - 134th St Low 41A Wear 2005 <br />Cottage Grove - Hyde Ave S Low LVWE35030B 1996 <br />Cottage Grove - Jensen Ave Low SPWEB340C 1986 <br />Inver Grove Heights - Brooks Blvd Low MVWE35035B 2009 <br />Burnsville - Knob Hill Area Low to Moderate 41A Wear 1996 <br />Brooklyn Park - 73rd Ave Moderate 41A Wear 1998 <br />Brooklyn Park - Louisiana Ave Moderate 41A Wear 1995 <br />Brooklyn Park - Winnetka Ave Moderate 41A Wear 1995 <br />Cottage Grove - Ingberg Trl S Moderate LVWE35030B 1995 <br />Woodbury - Bridgewater Moderate SPWEA240(R) 1998 <br />Woodbury - Newbury Alcove Straight Portion Moderate 41 Wear 1995 <br />Blaine - 93rd Ave East End Moderate to High 41A Wear 1994 <br />Blaine - 93rd Ave West End Moderate to High 41A Wear 1995 <br />Osseo - 8th Ave SE Moderate to High SPWEA240(R) 1992 <br />Burnsville - Heritage Cir Area High 41A Wear 1994 <br />Sibley County - CSAH 9 North Portion High SPWEA240(R) 1996 <br />Sibley County - CSAH 9 South Portion High SPWEA240(R) 1997 <br />Other questions were proposed to the research team through the course of the study, and these <br />questions were addressed based on limited information available to the study. Those questions include: <br />Is there a relationship between the use of a granular subbase and stripping in chip-sealed <br />pavements? <br />No relationship was apparent based on the performance of qualified sections in the study. <br />This can be observed in Table 1. <br />Does the use of polymer-modified emulsions for chip seals lead to stripping? <br />A large percentage of municipalities surveyed were unable to identify dates or years for <br />polymer-modified emulsion adoption for their chip seal treatments. Therefore, a <br />relationship between the presence of polymers and stripping could not be determined. <br />33 <br /> <br />