Agenda - Council - 01/14/2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CC Regular Session 7. 1. Meeting Date: 01/14/2020 By: Chloe McGuire Brigl, Community Development Information Title: Introduce Ordinance #20-01 Rezoning Two Parcels at 9340 Highway 10 NW; Case of MYWC, LLC Purpose/Background: The purpose of this case is to consider a zoning amendment request from MYWC, LLC (the "Applicant") to rezone two (2) properties from B-1 Business District to R-1 Single Family Detached Homes (MUSA). The properties were rezoned in the 1990s from Residential to Business and guided in the Comprehensive Plan as Mixed Use (which includes both business and residential uses). The eastern property includes a residential home that appears to have been built in the 1970s under a previous residential zoning district, and the western property is vacant. Since the home was built as a residential structure under a residential zoning district at the time, the use was provided lawful, non -conforming protections at the time of the 1990s Zoning Amendment. The property with the existing home is up for sale and via a request for a zoning verification letter, Staff found a potential issue with lawful non -conforming status as the Owner previously used the property exclusively for commercial (office) use. Notification: Notifications of this proposal were sent regarding the January 2 Public Hearing with the Planning Commission via Standard US Mail to Property Owners within 350 feet of the Subject Property, as reflected by Anoka County Property Records. A notice was also published in the Anoka Union Herald, the City's Official newspaper. Notification is not required for this step and has not been provided. Observations/Alternatives: Summary There are two properties owned by the Applicant; 9340 Highway 10 NW, which has an existing home, and the adjacent parcel to the west, which is currently vacant. The property with the home is up for sale and through the sales process, Staff became aware of the potential issue with lawful, nonconforming status. In working with the City Attorney, it does not appear that the residential use is lawful, nonconforming based on the most recent uses of the property. There was a gap of more than 12 months without a residential use, thereby abandoning the lawful, nonconforming protection under Minnesota Statutes. Evaluating existing conditions of the property and surrounding area, Staff does believe a residential zoning district is most appropriate. Staff recommends a zoning amendment to R-1 Residential to allow the residential use 'by right' and to remove any issues with lawful, nonconforming uses. The Owner agrees with this approach and has applied for this Zoning Amendment. Previous Uses The best information Staff has been able to find shows that the home was used in the following ways: From original construction until 2009 2010 - 2015 2015 - 2019 100% residential 100% office Mix of office and residential